Southern District

United Serv. Credit Union v. Goodrich (In re Goodrich)

Ruling: 
Creditor with actual knowledge of debtor's unemployment was not entitled to nondischargeable claim on basis of reliance on misrepresentations.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United Serv. Credit Union v. Goodrich (In re Goodrich). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 02,2015, LexisNexis #0415-117

Clarke County State Bank v. Scott (In re Scott)

Ruling: 
Proceeding for revocation of discharge dismissed as untimely.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Clarke County State Bank v. Scott (In re Scott). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 18,2014, LexisNexis #0414-026

In re Martin

Ruling: 
Case ordered converted or dismissed where presumption of abuse arose after exclusion of payments on student loan debt from unsecured priority debts.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Martin. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 14,2014, LexisNexis #0314-061

Nielsen v. ACS Inc. (In re Nielsen)

Chapter 7 debtor filed two adversary proceedings against creditors, seeking a determination that student loan debt she owed the creditors was dischargeable in bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(8). The cases were tried to the court.
Ruling: 
Student loan debt was nondischargeable given lack of undue hardship on part of healthy educated debtor who chose not to work.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nielsen v. ACS Inc. (In re Nielsen). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 24,2013, LexisNexis #0613-127

Hackert v. De Ronde (In re De Ronde)

Creditors filed an adversary proceeding against chapter 7 debtor, seeking a determination that debts the debtor owed were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523 and that the debtor was ineligible under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(3) and (5) to have her debts discharged. The court granted the debtor's request to try plaintiffs' claims under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727 in a separate trial.
Ruling: 
Discharge denied due to debtor's inability to explain loss of loan proceeds.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hackert v. De Ronde (In re De Ronde). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 24,2012, LexisNexis #1112-059

Lehms Omaha LLC v. Stanley (In re Stanley)

Plaintiff creditor filed this adversary proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) to contest the dischargeability of a debt that arose from its payment of a lien against equipment sold to it by defendant debtor. The matter was before the court for decision.
Ruling: 
Debt resulting from creditor buyer's payment of lien on equipment not disclosed by debtor at the time of sale was nondischargeable.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lehms Omaha LLC v. Stanley (In re Stanley). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 25,2012, LexisNexis #1012-084

Furuto v. Lewenilovo (In re Lewenilovo)

Plaintiff landlords filed an adversary proceeding against defendant chapter 7 debtors, a husband and wife, seeking a determination that the debtors owed them a debt that was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6). The case was tried to the court.
Ruling: 
Debtor's willful and intentional damage to landlord's property resulted in nondischargeable debt.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Furuto v. Lewenilovo (In re Lewenilovo). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 25,2012, LexisNexis #1212-084

Waterman v. United States (In re Waterman)

Debtor sought, via an adversary complaint filed against IRS, a determination under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(A) and (B) that certain federal income tax liabilities were properly discharged in her chapter 7 case. A central issue was whether debtor had made a fraudulent return or willfully attempted in any manner to evade or defeat such tax within the meaning of § 523(a)(1)(C).
Ruling: 
Tax debt for year in which return was filed and debtor did not pay but did not attempt to evade payment was dischargeable.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Waterman v. United States (In re Waterman). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 15,2012, LexisNexis #0712-080

Pages

Subscribe to Southern District