Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge kozinski

Tamm v. United States Trustee (In re Hokulani Square Inc.)

Ruling
Trustee could not collect fees on a credit bid in which trustee only distributed estate property.
Issue(s)
Whether the trustee's compensation may reflect the value of a credit bid?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tamm v. United States Trustee (In re Hokulani Square Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2015 , LexisNexis #0215-073

Tamm v. United States Trustee (In re Hokulani Square Inc.)

Ruling
Trustee could not collect fees on a credit bid in which trustee only distributed estate property.
Issue(s)
Whether the trustee's compensation may reflect the value of a credit bid?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tamm v. United States Trustee (In re Hokulani Square Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2015 , LexisNexis #0215-073

Espinosa v. United Student Aid. Funds Inc.

Ruling
Debtor could obtain discharge of student loan debt through chapter 13 plan where creditor had acutal notice and failed to object.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor sought review of a judgment from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona reversing the bankruptcy court's order which held that defendant creditor violated the discharge injunction under 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(a)(2) when it began intercepting the debtor's income tax refunds to satisfy the unpaid portion of his student loan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Espinosa v. United Student Aid. Funds Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 02, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-135