Skip to main content

§ 1225(a)(4)

Seifert v. Carlson (In re Seifert)

Ruling
Agreement on creditor's objections to debtor's chapter 12 plan did not render debtor's claim to exemption in proceeds of crop sale moot.
Issue(s)
Whether a bankruptcy court properly held that an objection to a chapter 12 debtor's claim of exemption in farm proceeds under Minn. Stat. § 550.37(13) was moot.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Seifert v. Carlson (In re Seifert) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 22, 2015 , LexisNexis #0615-100

In re Erickson

Ruling
Confirmation of chapter 12 plan denied due to failure to pay unsecured creditors the same amount as they would received under chapter 7.
Procedural posture

When debtor moved for confirmation of his third amended chapter 12 plan, the trustee and one creditor objected. At issue was whether plan confirmation under 11 U.S.C. § 1225 was properly denied.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Erickson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-098