Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge nail

Queen, In re

Ruling
Court affirmed the bankruptcy court's order for summary judgment in favor of debtors as theissue was not before the bankruptcy court and afforded no basis for the instant appeal. (B.A.P.8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Queen, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 19, 2019 , LexisNexis #0919-033

Marshall, In re

Ruling
Court affirmed dismissal of debtor's case as she failed to provide proof of receiving creditcounselling within the 180 days before she filed her bankruptcy petition. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Mandatory Credit Counseling.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marshall, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 28, 2019 , LexisNexis #0419-025

Thiel, In re--Velde v. Thiel

Ruling
Court did not commit clear error in revoking debtor's discharge for failing to surrenderfederal and state income tax returns to the trustee. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Revocation; Failure to Report, Deliver or Surrender Property.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Thiel, In re--Velde v. Thiel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 26, 2018 , LexisNexis #0918-022

Roggenbuck, In re--Roggenbuck v. SSA

Ruling
Overpayment claim not excepted from discharge as the SSA was unable to show it justifiablyrelied on the incomplete income information the debtor provided during the time theoverpayments were made. (Bankr. D.S.D.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Debts Not Duly Listed or Scheduled.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roggenbuck, In re--Roggenbuck v. SSA Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 24, 2018 , LexisNexis #0918-013

Tirrell, In re--Charles Gabus Motors, Inc. v. Tirrell

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in denying debtor's discharge after a creditor filed an affidavit of default with respect to a court-approved settlement agreement that was intended to resolve the nondischargeability adversary proceeding. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Discharge.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tirrell, In re--Charles Gabus Motors, Inc. v. Tirrell Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 06, 2017 , LexisNexis #1017-048

Wojciechowski, In re--Wojciechowski v. Wojciechowski

Ruling
Bankruptcy court's order confirming debtors' second amended plan affirmed as bankruptcycourt did not abuse its discretion in denying creditor's request for an evidentiary hearing ondebtors' second amended plan. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Filing, Objection to Confirmation, and Modification of a Plan in a Chapter 12 Family Farmer’s Debt Adjustment or a Chapter 13 Individual’s Debt Adjustment Case; Objection to

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wojciechowski, In re--Wojciechowski v. Wojciechowski Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 15, 2017 , LexisNexis #0717-087

Roberts Broad. Co., In re--Roberts Broad. Co. v. DeWoskin

Ruling
Bankruptcy court's order was affirmed as a review of the malpractice claim and evidence showed that abstention was the correct order. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roberts Broad. Co., In re--Roberts Broad. Co. v. DeWoskin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 08, 2017 , LexisNexis #0617-055

McDermott v. Crabtree (In re Crabtree)

Ruling
Bankruptcy appellate panel reversed the bankruptcy court's order reducing the amount ofhomestead exemption the debtors claimed as record showed that the court did not requiretrustee to show that debtors intended to defraud their creditors. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Exemptions; Residences, Burial Plots and Homesteads.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McDermott v. Crabtree (In re Crabtree) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 24, 2017 , LexisNexis #0217-084

Schmidt v. Schmidt (In re Nelson)

Ruling
State court judgment for willful and malicious injury was nondischargeable. (Bankr. D.S.D.)
Issue(s)
Was state court judgment claim nondischargeable as based on willful and malicious injury?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schmidt v. Schmidt (In re Nelson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 03, 2016 , LexisNexis #1016-116

In re Northern Beef Packers LP

Ruling
Debtor’s attorneys allowed fees for post-sale, preconversion services that were likely tobenefit the estate. (Bankr. D.S.D.)
Issue(s)
Should debtor’s attorneys’ fee application be allowed?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Northern Beef Packers LP Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 29, 2016 , LexisNexis #0916-079