Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge murtha

Rombro v. Dufrayne (In re Med Diversified Inc.)

Ruling
Claim based on termination agreement with debtor providing for exchange of prime stock for debtor's common stock was subject to equitable subordination.
Procedural posture

In a debtor's chapter 11 proceeding, appellant creditor filed a proof of claim based on his termination agreement with the debtor. Appellee trustee filed a complaint against the creditor alleging that his claim was subject to mandatory subordination under 11 U.S.C. § 510(b). The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment for the trustee, and the District Court for the Eastern District of New York affirmed. The creditor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rombro v. Dufrayne (In re Med Diversified Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on August 26, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-082