Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge goodin

In re Wardrobe

Ruling
When stay was lifted solely to allow state court consideration of claims against debtor's bonding companies, resulting judgment did not have preclusive effect.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor appealed the judgment of the Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel that reversed a bankruptcy court's decision that a state court judgment was entitled to preclusive effect and that the creditor stated a cause of action under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) against appellee debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wardrobe Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 16, 2009 , LexisNexis #0409-100