Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge randolph

Marshall v. Honeywell Tech. Sys.

Ruling
Debtor was estopped from bringing discrimination action that was property of the estate.
Issue(s)
Did the district court properly dismiss debtor’s discrimination complaint on the ground of "judicial estoppel," stemming from her failure to disclose this lawsuit and related administrative proceedings on the schedules she filed with the bankruptcy

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marshall v. Honeywell Tech. Sys. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 12, 2016 , LexisNexis #0816-015

McCarthy v. BMW Bankr. of N. Am.

Ruling
Security interest not perfected in timely manner could be avoided.
Procedural posture

In an adversary proceeding, pro se appellant chapter 7 trustee appealed the District Court for the District of Columbia's affirmation of a bankruptcy judge's finding that a bank had perfected its security interest in the sole asset of the estate outside the 90-day period of 11 U.S.C. 547 since, under District of Columbia (District) common law, a prior lien gave a prior legal right except where statute varied the common law rule.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McCarthy v. BMW Bankr. of N. Am. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #1207-105