§ 727(a)

Rumptz, In re--Jones v. Rumptz

Ruling: 
Motion objecting to debtor's discharge denied where debtor did not transfer property withinthe year prior to the petition date or after the petition date with the intent to hinder, delay, ordefraud creditors. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rumptz, In re--Jones v. Rumptz. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 12,2020, LexisNexis #0620-094

Richmond, In re--DFWMM Holdings, LLC v. Richmond

Ruling: 
Debtor’s false statements were not grounds for denial of discharge where debtor did not havefraudulent intent as he reasonably relied on advice of Counsel. (Bankr. M.D.N.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Richmond, In re--DFWMM Holdings, LLC v. Richmond. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2020, LexisNexis #0620-070

Waggoner, In re--Heizer v. Waggoner

Ruling: 
Denial of discharge denied absent fraudulent intent as debtors were not insiders and therewas no evidence that the price the buyers paid was less than fair market value. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Waggoner, In re--Heizer v. Waggoner. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 24,2020, LexisNexis #0620-069

McDonald, In re--McDermott v. McDonald

Ruling: 
Trustee entitled to summary judgment where debtor failed to explain satisfactorily thedissipation of substantial cash. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McDonald, In re--McDermott v. McDonald. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 17,2020, LexisNexis #0620-044

Hickman, In re--The Shank, LLC v. Hickman

Ruling: 
Debtor's discharge was denied as court concluded that the material and cumulative nature ofdebtor's misstatements and omissions were more than sufficient to establish a pattern offalsity. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hickman, In re--The Shank, LLC v. Hickman. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 17,2020, LexisNexis #0620-045

Wortham, In re--McPherson Co-op Credit Union v. Wortham

Ruling: 
Creditor's complaint for denial of discharge dismissed as time-barred where trustee’sextension of time did not apply to creditor. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wortham, In re--McPherson Co-op Credit Union v. Wortham. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 07,2020, LexisNexis #0620-019

Dykes, In re--Dykes v. Dykes

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court judgment denying debtors a discharge was affirmed as debtorsunjustifiably failed to keep adequate records of financially significant transactions. (8th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dykes, In re--Dykes v. Dykes. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 03,2020, LexisNexis #0520-095

Amphone, In re--Lashinsky v. Amphone

Ruling: 
Debtor's discharge was granted as debtor kept records that satisfactorily explained her lossesto the court. (Bankr. D. Kan.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Amphone, In re--Lashinsky v. Amphone. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 24,2020, LexisNexis #0420-045

Lapace, In re--Welch v. Lapace

Ruling: 
Denial of Chapter 7 discharge was not warranted as debtors' failure to disclose a pre-petitioncontract for sale of their home was not done with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraudcreditors. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lapace, In re--Welch v. Lapace. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 19,2020, LexisNexis #0420-021

Van Auken, In re--McDermott v. Van Auken

Ruling: 
Debtor's discharge was denied where debtor's petition and schedules regarding his incomefailed to meet the minimum threshold of reliability. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Van Auken, In re--McDermott v. Van Auken. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 14,2020, LexisNexis #0320-093

Pages

Subscribe to § 727(a)