Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

District of hawaii

Frantz, In re--Frantz v. Doling

Ruling
Sanctions against debtor’s counsel were reversed where a good faith argument could be madethat statements that debtors had completed their Chapter 13 plan were not false.(B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Signing of Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions; Verification and Copies of

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Frantz, In re--Frantz v. Doling Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 29, 2023 , LexisNexis #0224-099

Lee, In re--Mission Hen, LLC v. Lee

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in allowing Chapter 13 debtors to bifurcate a claim that wassecured by a junior lien on debtors' residence and treat part of its claim as unsecured. (B.A.P.9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Debtor’s Principal Residence; Modification of Home Mortgages.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lee, In re--Mission Hen, LLC v. Lee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 13, 2023 , LexisNexis #0124-046

East Coast Foods, Inc., In re--Development Specialists, Inc. v. East Coast Foods, Inc.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in denying debtor leave to sue the trustee in another court as theclaims arose out of estate administration. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of East Coast Foods, Inc., In re--Development Specialists, Inc. v. East Coast Foods, Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 19, 2023 , LexisNexis #1023-020

RS AIR, LLC, In re--RS AIR, LLC v. NetJets Aviation, Inc.

Ruling
Judgment affirmed as the creditors did not violate the discharge injunction when they sued to collect the discharged debt from the debtor's alleged alter egos. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Discharge; Liability of Other Entities Not Affected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of RS AIR, LLC, In re--RS AIR, LLC v. NetJets Aviation, Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 02, 2023 , LexisNexis #0723-086

Powell, In re--TICO Constr. Co. v. Van Meter

Ruling
Debtor had a right to dismiss his Chapter 13 case even in the face of allegations of bad faith orabuse of the bankruptcy process. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Conversion or Dismissal; Dismissal on Request of Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Powell, In re--TICO Constr. Co. v. Van Meter Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 21, 2022 , LexisNexis #0123-021

Open Med. Inst., In re--Spark Factor Design, Inc. v. Hjelmeset

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion as it properly evaluated the fairness andreasonableness of compromise between trustee and debtor. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Use, Sale, or Lease of Property.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Open Med. Inst., In re--Spark Factor Design, Inc. v. Hjelmeset Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 26, 2022 , LexisNexis #0722-057

Stuart, In re--Stuart v. City of Scottsdale

Ruling
Creditor did not violate the automatic stay when it failed to move to quash a writ ofgarnishment or cause a bank to unfreeze debtor bank accounts. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Scope.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stuart, In re--Stuart v. City of Scottsdale Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 10, 2021 , LexisNexis #0122-004

Sienega, In re--Sienega v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd.

Ruling
Chapter 7 debtor's tax debts were nondischargeable where he did not file "formal" state taxreturns and faxes sent to the State Franchise Tax Board were not signed and did not state thatthey were submitted under penalty of perjury. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Taxes; Late or Unfiled Return.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sienega, In re--Sienega v. Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 05, 2020 , LexisNexis #1120-85

Cordero, In re

Ruling
Combined plan of reorganization confirmed where trustee proposed the plan in good faith. (Bankr. D. Haw.)
Issue(s)
Confirmation of Plan; Requirements; Plan Proposed in Good Faith.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cordero, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 16, 2020 , LexisNexis #0820-094

Berkley, In re--Berkley v. Burchard

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in granting trustee's motion to modify theconfirmed plan to increase payments to unsecured creditors. (B.A.P. 9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Modification of Plan After Confirmation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Berkley, In re--Berkley v. Burchard Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 17, 2020 , LexisNexis #0620-047