Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge taylor

Sneed v. Hartsfield (In re Hartsfield)

Ruling
State court judgment of fiduciary defalcation was nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff, a successor trustee and the personal representative of a decedent's estate, filed an adversary proceeding against chapter 11 debtor, objecting to exemptions the debtor claimed and seeking a determination that the debtor owed two debts that were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(4) because he committed fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity. The case was tried to the court.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sneed v. Hartsfield (In re Hartsfield) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 03, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-052

In re Booth

Ruling
Plan could not preclude mortgage creditor's postpetition fees but could require application of payments as though loan was current.
Procedural posture

A bankruptcy debtor's chapter 13 plan included provisions which precluded the debtor's mortgage creditor from charging postpetition fees, and required the creditor to apply plan payments by deeming any pre-petition arrearages to be contractually current and notify the debtor and others concerning changes in payment amount. The creditor challenged these plan provisions and objected to confirmation of the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Booth Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 14, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-089

Iberg v. Prewett (In re Iberg)

Ruling
Debtors' failure to schedule a truck was not gounds for denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff property owner filed a complaint against defendant chapter 7 debtors, seeking monetary damages for breach of contract, denial of discharge based on 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(5), a determination of dischargeability pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Iberg v. Prewett (In re Iberg) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 16, 2008 , LexisNexis #0109-022

In re Sutter

Ruling
Denial of homestead exemption reversed and remanded for determination of whether equitable mortgage existed in absence of signed mortgage deed.
Procedural posture

The bankruptcy court sustained an objection, filed by appellee trustee, mortgage purchaser, and mortgage assignee, to appellant chapter 13 debtors'request for a homestead exemption under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(g). The court also granted the trustee's motion to sell a mortgage interest to the mortgage purchaser. The debtors challenged both orders.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sutter Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 23, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-077

In re Ealy

Ruling
IRS not entitled to relief from stay to setoff debtor's postpetition overpayment and economic stimulus rebate against tax liability.
Procedural posture

After a bankruptcy debtor's chapter 13 plan was confirmed, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) claimed a right of setoff of the debtor's postpetition tax overpayment and economic stimulus payment against the debtor's tax liability. The IRS moved to modify the automatic bankruptcy stay to permit the setoff.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Ealy Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 11, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-132

In re Lasowski

Ruling
Plan confirmed over trustee's objection as court could not require proration of 401(k) loan payments even though loans would be paid off before plan completion.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee objected to the confirmation of the plan of an above- median debtor. Because the debtor would pay off her 401(k) loan obligations before the completion of the proposed plan, the trustee objected to the debtor claiming a full deduction for the monthly loan payments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lasowski Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 14, 2007 , LexisNexis #1007-092

In re Frederickson

Ruling
Forty-eight-month plan approved for above-median debtor who had no disposable income and was not required to make payments to unsecured creditors.
Procedural posture

Debtor's chapter 13 plan, proposed for a 48-month period, asserted that, according to Form 22C, the debtor was not required to make any payments to his unsecured creditors under the plan, for lack of any disposable income under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(3). The trustee in bankruptcy objected, arguing that the plan must provide for payments over a 60-month period under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(4)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Frederickson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 16, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-118

In re Evinger

Ruling
Trustee's motion for turnover of originally unscheduled assets granted due to debtor's delay in making correction.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee filed a motion for turnover of unscheduled assets pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 542(a) and objected to the claimed exemptions in the unscheduled assets.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Evinger Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-131

In re Petty

Ruling
Trustee's objection to plan confirmation was overruled since the debtors'proposed charitable contribution did not exceed the cap of 15 percent of the debtors'gross income.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the debtors'proposed plan. The basis for the trustee's objection was that the debtors have scheduled monthly charitable contributions, in the form of weekly tithes and offerings to his church, while only paying unsecured creditors approximately one percent of their claims over the life of the plan. The trustee also moved for dismissal of the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Petty Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #0406-065

In re Petty

Ruling
Trustee was denied a dismissal request since the trustee failed to show the debtors filed their plan in bad faith.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of the debtors'proposed plan. The basis for the trustee's objection was that the debtors have scheduled monthly charitable contributions, in the form of weekly tithes and offerings to his church, while only paying unsecured creditors approximately one percent of their claims over the life of the plan. The trustee also moved for dismissal of the case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1307.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Petty Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #0406-063