Skip to main content

§ 727(a)(5)

Pappas, In re--Pnevmatikos v. Pappas

Ruling
Motion to dismiss for alleged unexplained loss of assets was denied due to creditor’s failure to specify the assets in question. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pappas, In re--Pnevmatikos v. Pappas Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 26, 2025 , LexisNexis #0525-039

Villarreal, In re

Ruling
Chapter 7 debtor was denied a discharge as explanations of having "lived lavishly" did not overcome burden to provide a satisfactory explanation for absence of proceeds of pre-bankruptcy home sale. (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Villarreal, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 08, 2024 , LexisNexis #0125-063

Crawford, In re--Smithyman v. Crawford

Ruling
Creditor was not entitled to have his entire contractual debt determined to benondischargeable and/or to an order denying the defendant a discharge as the undisputedfacts did not support these demands. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Crawford, In re--Smithyman v. Crawford Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 27, 2023 , LexisNexis #1223-016

Gleiber, In re

Ruling
Debtor was entitled to recover fees and costs in an adversary proceeding for denial ofdischarge as the prevailing party pursuant to state law. (Bankr. S.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gleiber, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 28, 2023 , LexisNexis #1123-018

Tucker, In re

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor’s failure to preserve information from which interested partiescould have ascertained his financial condition or to account for absence of more than$1,000,000. (Bankr. N.D. W. Va.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tucker, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 09, 2022 , LexisNexis #0822-018

Vereen, In re--United States SBA v. Vereen

Ruling
Discharge denied as debtor failed to adequately explain the disposition of the trucks that hepurchased with SBA loan money. (Bankr. M.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Vereen, In re--United States SBA v. Vereen Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 04, 2022 , LexisNexis #0622-018

McDonald v. McDonald

Ruling
Denial of discharge affirmed where debtor failed to provide a satisfactory explanation fordeficiency in assets. (6th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McDonald v. McDonald Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 01, 2022 , LexisNexis #0522-091

Ferguson, In re--Ferguson

Ruling
Trustee made prima facie showing that funds sufficient to pay the debtor's debts in fullexisted and debtor failed to sufficiently explain the dissipation of such funds despite claimingthat the money was lost gambling. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ferguson, In re--Ferguson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 29, 2021 , LexisNexis #1221-096

Adkins, In re--Quality Car & Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Adkins

Ruling
Debtor's discharge was denied where creditor has shown that debtor possessed livestock andequipment at filing and as there was no discharge entered, creditor also showed theunexplained loss of those assets prior to discharge. (Bankr. S.D. W. Va.)HOLDINGS; [1]-Creditor was not entitled to summary judgment on its 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(B) claim, asit provided insufficient proof that any transfers of its collateral -- equipment or livestock -- were made afterthe filing date of the petition; [2]-Creditor made the requisite showing under § 727(a)(5), as debtoracknowledged on his schedules that he owned livestock and equipment at filing and, because no dischargewas entered, creditor showed the unexplained loss of those assets prior to discharge; [3]-Debtor's claim thatthe collateral was taken or sold by another creditor was a fantastical assertion, as livestock and farmequipment were not small possessions that could easily be removed without his knowledge; [4]-Assertionthat he had no idea where the equipment or cattle went was simply incredible and did not rise to the levelof the showing required to defeat summary judgment.Adkins, In re--Quality Car & Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Adkins, 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 4099 (Bankr. S.D. W. Va. December 1, 2017) (Volk, C.B.J.).
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Adkins, In re--Quality Car & Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Adkins Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 01, 2017 , LexisNexis #0118-027

Brown, In re--Grassmann v. Brown

Ruling
Court declined to grant discharge where debtor failed to explain the proven disappearance of a large portion of the sale proceeds from the sale of a property. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Brown, In re--Grassmann v. Brown Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 23, 2017 , LexisNexis #0717-111