Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge gorman

Richardson v. Principal Financial Group (In re Bayless)

Ruling
Repayment of excess disability payments was avoidable as preferential.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff trustee filed an adversary proceeding to avoid as a preferential transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 547(b) a repayment of disability benefits by defendant debtors to defendant insurer within the 90-day period before the bankruptcy filing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Richardson v. Principal Financial Group (In re Bayless) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 12, 2007 , LexisNexis #0807-080

In re Carlton

Ruling
Debtors' deductions for payments of secured debt on three motor vehicles allowed over trustee's objection.
Procedural posture

Trustee objected to confirmation of chapter 13 debtors'plan pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Carlton Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 28, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-043

Cripe v. Mathis (In re Mathis)

Ruling
Default judgment for fraud and embezzlement by debtor in construction of creditor's house was dischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditors commenced an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of their default judgment against defendant debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(4) because of alleged fraud and embezzlement arising out of the construction of the creditors'house.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cripe v. Mathis (In re Mathis) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 06, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-015

In re Sanders

Ruling
Trustee's objection to confirmation based on treatment of cross-collateralized claims denied due to faulty attempt to apply 1325(a) hanging paragraph.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 matter came before the court for hearing on confirmation of the First Amended Chapter 13 Plan filed by debtor. The trustee objected to confirmation of the Amended Plan, citing provisions of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act ("BAPCPA").

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sanders Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 20, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-045

Cillnet Inc. v. Fortin (In re Fortin)

Ruling
Deposition testimony could not be challenged by sham affidavits intended to prevent discharge of debt.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor commenced an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of defendant debtor's debt. The complaint was based on 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). The matter was before the court on debtor's motion for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cillnet Inc. v. Fortin (In re Fortin) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 16, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-021

Housley, In re

Ruling
Court entered order providing for adequate protection payments to be made. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Payments; Plan Payments.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Housley, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 02, 2006 , LexisNexis #0418-023

Coatney v. United States Dept of Educ. (In re Coatney)

Ruling
Four year deferral of student loan debt granted to debtor who did not establish undue hardship.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor sought to discharge his student loan debt to defendant United States Department of Education pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Coatney v. United States Dept of Educ. (In re Coatney) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 19, 2006 , LexisNexis #0906-126

In re Demirco Group (N. Am.) L.L.C.

Ruling
Creditor was granted additional time to file amended involuntary petition since original petition did not have required number of petitioning creditors.
Procedural posture

The matter came before the court upon an involuntary petition filed under chapter 7 by the petitioning creditor against the alleged debtor. The alleged debtor filed an answer and motion to dismiss the involuntary petition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Demirco Group (N. Am.) L.L.C. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 14, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-002

In re Demirco Holdings Inc.

Ruling
Court denied motion to dismiss since there was no evidence that involuntary petition was filed in bad faith.
Procedural posture

Petitioning creditor, a bank, filed a chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy petition pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 303 against alleged debtor, a holding company. The company answered the petition and filed a motion seeking to dismiss the involuntary petition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Demirco Holdings Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 09, 2006 , LexisNexis #0706-075

Johnson v. Curtis (In re Curtis)

Ruling
Debts owed to lenders were dischargeable despite debtor's omission of pertinent information since lenders failed to show they justifiably relied on the misrepresentations.
Procedural posture

Adversary plaintiffs who each made personal short term loans to debtor with the promise of quick and dramatic profits, sought a determination of the nondischargeability of their respective debt, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). Debtor had been the victim of a long-running scheme whereby he repeatedly paid fees to European swindlers for the promise of a large commission.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Johnson v. Curtis (In re Curtis) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on May 24, 2006 , LexisNexis #0606-089