Central District

Brashear, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee met his burden of proof to show that debtor was rendered insolvent by the transfer.(Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Brashear, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 30,2023, LexisNexis #0124-085

Craig, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor awarded punitive damages as creditor filed a lawsuit two days after the petition datein violation of the automatic stay. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Craig, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 23,2023, LexisNexis #1223-080

Harding, In re

Ruling: 
Debtor’s exemptions in insurance proceeds allowed but limited to the amounts claimed on herschedules as filed. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harding, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 25,2023, LexisNexis #1123-012

Wallace, In re--Wallace v. IRS

Ruling: 
Abstention was not warranted in an adversary proceeding where debtor sought adetermination that prior tax debts owed to the IRS were dischargeable. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wallace, In re--Wallace v. IRS. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 18,2023, LexisNexis #1023-047

Tarrant, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee was entitled to reopen the bankruptcy case to determine if a pending lawsuit involving cancer from exposure to a certain chemical should have been part of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tarrant, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 13,2015, LexisNexis #0523-053

Schertz, In re--Reinbold v. Schertz

Ruling: 
Trustee was allowed to proceed with selling the property free and clear of the co-owner'sinterest as the trustee established that selling the property would yield a significant dividendto the creditors of the debtor's bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schertz, In re--Reinbold v. Schertz. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 17,2022, LexisNexis #0123-57

Jividen, In re

Ruling: 
IRS claim was not entitled to priority status and was properly classified as a non-prioritygeneral unsecured claim. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jividen, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 30,2014, LexisNexis #0123-006

Le La Nails, LLC, In re

Ruling: 
Disgorgement of attorneys fees in two cases involving the same attorneys was warranted asdebtors' counsel failed to satisfy their professional obligations. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Le La Nails, LLC, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 08,2022, LexisNexis #1122-029

Le La Nails, In re

Ruling: 
Two companies were ineligible to be debtors in the bankruptcy cases filed in their names asneither ever had a residence, domicile, place of business, or property in the United States.(Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Le La Nails, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 18,2022, LexisNexis #1022-001

Taylor, In re--Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec. v. Taylor

Ruling: 
Debt owed to state department of employment security was excepted from discharge as debtormade false representations when he reported that he was laid off by both of his employers.(Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Taylor, In re--Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec. v. Taylor. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 01,2022, LexisNexis #0922-084

Pages

Subscribe to Central District