Central District

Tarrant, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee was entitled to reopen the bankruptcy case to determine if a pending lawsuit involving cancer from exposure to a certain chemical should have been part of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tarrant, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 13,2015, LexisNexis #0523-053

Schertz, In re--Reinbold v. Schertz

Ruling: 
Trustee was allowed to proceed with selling the property free and clear of the co-owner'sinterest as the trustee established that selling the property would yield a significant dividendto the creditors of the debtor's bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schertz, In re--Reinbold v. Schertz. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 17,2022, LexisNexis #0123-57

Jividen, In re

Ruling: 
IRS claim was not entitled to priority status and was properly classified as a non-prioritygeneral unsecured claim. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jividen, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 30,2014, LexisNexis #0123-006

Le La Nails, LLC, In re

Ruling: 
Disgorgement of attorneys fees in two cases involving the same attorneys was warranted asdebtors' counsel failed to satisfy their professional obligations. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Le La Nails, LLC, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 08,2022, LexisNexis #1122-029

Le La Nails, In re

Ruling: 
Two companies were ineligible to be debtors in the bankruptcy cases filed in their names asneither ever had a residence, domicile, place of business, or property in the United States.(Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Le La Nails, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 18,2022, LexisNexis #1022-001

Taylor, In re--Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec. v. Taylor

Ruling: 
Debt owed to state department of employment security was excepted from discharge as debtormade false representations when he reported that he was laid off by both of his employers.(Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Taylor, In re--Illinois Dep't of Emp. Sec. v. Taylor. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 01,2022, LexisNexis #0922-084

Louis, In re

Ruling: 
Fee applications filed by debtor's attorney and the Subchapter V trustee were approved infull as the United States trustee had neither objected to nor commented on the fee requests.(Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Louis, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 07,2022, LexisNexis #0722-077

Powell, In re

Ruling: 
Trustee's motion to modify the debtors' plan granted. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Powell, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on April 07,2022, LexisNexis #0522-098

Baker, In re

Ruling: 
Complaint filed as a claim was not entitled to any presumption of validity or amount. (Bankr.C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Baker, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 07,2022, LexisNexis #0422-095

Kincaid, In re

Ruling: 
Fees paid to attorney and law firm ordered disgorged due to multiple errors that depriveddebtor of primary benefits of discharge. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kincaid, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 09,2021, LexisNexis #0122-078

Pages

Subscribe to Central District