§ 523(a)(2)

Watters, In re--Reticulum Mgmt., LLC v. Watters

Ruling: 
Creditor failed to show that debt was nondischargeable because its evidence wholly failed toprove that debtor made any representation to the creditor with the subjective intent to deceive.(Bankr. N.D. Tex.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Watters, In re--Reticulum Mgmt., LLC v. Watters. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 24,2021, LexisNexis #1021-036

Garcia v. Garcia

Ruling: 
Nondischargeability complaint dismissed as plaintiff did not establish that debtor made anymisrepresentation, either by affirmative statement or omission, regarding constructionpermits. (Bankr. D. Mass.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Garcia v. Garcia. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 25,2021, LexisNexis #1021-037

Prifti, In re--Criswell Chevrolet, Inc. v. Prifti

Ruling: 
Debt was dischargeable because debtor did not intend to defraud the creditor as debtor'seffort to sell his own car fell through. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Prifti, In re--Criswell Chevrolet, Inc. v. Prifti. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 16,2021, LexisNexis #1021-007

Ollis, In re--Thompson v. Oliis

Ruling: 
Debts were nondischargeable as arising from debtor farmer’s fraudulent scheme to obtainloans from creditors based on promises that it did not intend to fulfill. (Bankr. D.S.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ollis, In re--Thompson v. Oliis. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 04,2021, LexisNexis #0921-088

Rosen, In re--Rioux v. Rioux

Ruling: 
Debt was non-dischargeable as the various food and Medicaid assistance applications werematerially false in several respects. (Bankr. D. Colo.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rosen, In re--Rioux v. Rioux. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 02,2021, LexisNexis #0921-061

Bello, In re--Hap Lift, LLC v. Bello

Ruling: 
Creditor's request for judgment on its nondischargeability claim was denied as he failed toprove that debtor's representation that he was solvent on the date he signed a personalguaranty was false. (Bankr. D.N.J.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bello, In re--Hap Lift, LLC v. Bello. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 04,2021, LexisNexis #0921-037

Marsh, In re--Madison Res. Funding Corp. v. Marsh

Ruling: 
Bankruptcy court did not err in calculating damages and determining nondischargeabilityof debt. (B.A.P. 8th Cir.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marsh, In re--Madison Res. Funding Corp. v. Marsh. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 21,2021, LexisNexis #0921-013

Rodriguez, In re--Midfirst Bank v. Rodriguez

Ruling: 
Debt was excepted from discharge based on false pretenses where debtor engaged in ascheme with a friend to create a false impression. (Bankr. W.D. Okla.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rodriguez, In re--Midfirst Bank v. Rodriguez. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 21,2021, LexisNexis #0921-014

Krizan, In re--Krizan v. Krizan

Ruling: 
Creditors were entitled to judgment of nondischargeability as there were multiple, materialmisrepresentations, omissions, and nondisclosures by debtor. (Bankr. W.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Krizan, In re--Krizan v. Krizan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 15,2021, LexisNexis #0921-010

Krizan, In re--Krizan v. Krizan

Ruling: 
Creditors were entitled to a judgment of nondischargeability as debtor's conductdemonstrated a pattern of deceit, deceptive conduct, and disregard for the truth andcreditors justifiably relied on representations. (Bankr. W.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Krizan, In re--Krizan v. Krizan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 15,2021, LexisNexis #0921-011

Pages

Subscribe to § 523(a)(2)