Judge Ludwig

Poivey, In re

Ruling: 
Royalty check proceeds were marital property to which debtor husband was entitled to applyhis wildcard exemption rights. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poivey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 11,2018, LexisNexis #0618-043

Poivey, In re

Ruling: 
Mineral rights inherited by debtor wife deemed property of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr.E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poivey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 24,2018, LexisNexis #0318-016

Poivey, In re

Ruling: 
Mineral rights inherited by debtor wife deemed property of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr.E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poivey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 24,2018, LexisNexis #0318-016

Payne, In re

Ruling: 
Foreclosure dispute remanded to state court. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Payne, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 22,2017, LexisNexis #1017-117

Mendiola, In re

Ruling: 
Failure to make plan payments 30 days after the plan was filed, as well as failure to makeregular plan payments was deemed cause for dismissal of the case. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mendiola, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 15,2017, LexisNexis #1017-089

Toth v. Bodyonics Ltd.

Plaintiffs filed a consumer class action complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (Pennsylvania) against defendant companies alleging that they engaged in deceptive and unfair marketing with regard to a muscle-building product. Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand after company two removed the suit to the court. Company two moved to transfer the suit to the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Ruling: 
Class action suit for alleged deceptive marketing of body building products was related to bankruptcy of defendant supplier against which co-defendant had filed an indemnity claim.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Toth v. Bodyonics Ltd.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Subscribe to Judge Ludwig