Aug
10
2018
Bagg, In re--Heinrich v. Bagg
Ruling:
Court found that debt was dischargeable, and dismissed the creditor's complaint as creditor failed to show that the debtors filed their action with the intent to injure him. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bagg, In re--Heinrich v. Bagg. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 10,2018, LexisNexis #0918-106
Aug
03
2018
Bernhard, In re
Ruling:
Debtor was ineligible to be a chapter 13 debtor as his liquidated unsecured debt exceeded the limit after adding a guaranty that was deemed liquidated. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bernhard, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 03,2018, LexisNexis #0918-032
Mar
23
2018
Bailey-Pfeiffer, In re
Ruling:
Court dismissed case but allowed debtor to avoid dismissal by converting case to one underchapter 7 or 11 as her ineligibility for chapter 13 could not be cured. (Bankr. W.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bailey-Pfeiffer, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 23,2018, LexisNexis #0818-079
Jul
09
2018
Hopson, In re--Hopson v. City of Milwaukee
Ruling:
Debtor was required to file an amended plan so that the creditor would receive distributionsnot less than the value of its allowed secured claim as it did not consent to less favorabletreatment for its property tax claims. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hopson, In re--Hopson v. City of Milwaukee. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 09,2018, LexisNexis #0818-083
May
11
2018
Poivey, In re
Ruling:
Royalty check proceeds were marital property to which debtor husband was entitled to applyhis wildcard exemption rights. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poivey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 11,2018, LexisNexis #0618-043
Jan
24
2018
Poivey, In re
Ruling:
Mineral rights inherited by debtor wife deemed property of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr.E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poivey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 24,2018, LexisNexis #0318-016
Jan
24
2018
Poivey, In re
Ruling:
Mineral rights inherited by debtor wife deemed property of the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr.E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Poivey, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 24,2018, LexisNexis #0318-016
Sep
22
2017
Payne, In re
Ruling:
Foreclosure dispute remanded to state court. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Payne, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 22,2017, LexisNexis #1017-117
Sep
15
2017
Mendiola, In re
Ruling:
Failure to make plan payments 30 days after the plan was filed, as well as failure to makeregular plan payments was deemed cause for dismissal of the case. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mendiola, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 15,2017, LexisNexis #1017-089
Mar
15
2007
Toth v. Bodyonics Ltd.
Plaintiffs filed a consumer class action complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (Pennsylvania) against defendant companies alleging that they engaged in deceptive and unfair marketing with regard to a muscle-building product. Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand after company two removed the suit to the court. Company two moved to transfer the suit to the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Ruling:
Class action suit for alleged deceptive marketing of body building products was related to bankruptcy of defendant supplier against which co-defendant had filed an indemnity claim.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Toth v. Bodyonics Ltd.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
