Hopson, In re--Hopson v. City of Milwaukee

Debtor was required to file an amended plan so that the creditor would receive distributionsnot less than the value of its allowed secured claim as it did not consent to less favorabletreatment for its property tax claims. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
Confirmation of Plan; Conditions for Confirmation; Allowed Secured Claimholders.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hopson, In re--Hopson v. City of Milwaukee. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on July 09,2018, LexisNexis #0818-083