Skip to main content

Crawford, In re--Smithyman v. Crawford

Crawford, In re--Smithyman v. Crawford

Ruling
Creditor was not entitled to have his entire contractual debt determined to benondischargeable and/or to an order denying the defendant a discharge as the undisputedfacts did not support these demands. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Failure to Explain Losses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Crawford, In re--Smithyman v. Crawford Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 27, 2023 , LexisNexis #1223-016