Skip to main content

§ 727(a)(4)(A)

Chase v. Harris (In re Harris)

Ruling
Discharge properly denied due to debtor's omission of five credit cards from schedules.
Procedural posture

Defendant debtor appealed an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts, which granted plaintiff creditor's request to deny the debtor a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chase v. Harris (In re Harris) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 15, 2008 , LexisNexis #0508-122

Chase v. Harris (In re Chase)

Ruling
Debtor who acted with reckless indifference to truth and made no attempt to amend schedules after admitting to intentional omissions was properly denied discharge.
Procedural posture

Defendant debtor appealed an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts, which granted plaintiff creditor's request to deny the debtor a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chase v. Harris (In re Chase) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 15, 2008 , LexisNexis #0508-018

Hyundai Motor Fin. Co. v. Adamo (In re Adamo)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's fraudulent transfers and false statements about assets.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 motion for summary judgment on its adversary proceeding seeking to deny a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A) and (2)(B) on the ground that defendant debtor fraudulently transferred assets belonging to the bankruptcy estate and made false statements about his assets.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hyundai Motor Fin. Co. v. Adamo (In re Adamo) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 11, 2008 , LexisNexis #0608-019

Cadle Co. v. Zofko (In re Zofko)

Ruling
Debtor's omissions did not rise to level that would require denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant debtor seeking to deny the debtor his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727. The matter was appealed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The district court remanded the matter after it was unclear whether the correct legal standard was applied relative to intent under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cadle Co. v. Zofko (In re Zofko) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 07, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308033

Khalil v. Developers Sur. & Indem. Co. (In re Khalil)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's reckless indifference to accuracy of statements and schedules.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor challenged the Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California's judgment denying his discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) (amended 2005) for knowingly and fraudulently making a false oath or account in, or in connection with, this bankruptcy case. Appellee creditor cross-appealed seeking denial of debtor's discharge under other provisions of section 727(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Khalil v. Developers Sur. & Indem. Co. (In re Khalil) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-079

Schmitt v. OBrien (In re OBrien)

Ruling
Multiple nondisclosures by debtor resulted in denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, the U.S. Trustee and a bankruptcy trustee, brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor, alleging that the debtor made false oaths and accounts in failing to disclose assets and transfers which warranted a denial of the debtor's discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A). The bankruptcy court conducted a trial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schmitt v. OBrien (In re OBrien) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2007 , LexisNexis #1107-136

Wieland v. Harvey (In re Harvey)

Ruling
Debtor's failure to disclose assets and material omissions justified denial of discharge but co- debtor spouse was granted a discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff United States Trustee ("UST") objected to the discharge of defendants, a debtor and his co-debtor, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wieland v. Harvey (In re Harvey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 16, 2007 , LexisNexis #1207-034

Mercantile Peninsula Bank v. French (In re French)

Ruling
Denial of discharge reversed and remanded due to reasonable question of fact regarding debtor's intent.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor appealed the final judgment of the District Court for the District of Maryland affirming the decision of the bankruptcy court. By its opinion, the bankruptcy court denied the debtor's discharge petition and awarded summary judgment to a creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mercantile Peninsula Bank v. French (In re French) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on August 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-138

Roberts v. Montgomery (In re Montgomery)

Ruling
Intentional errors and omissions in schedules made with intent to deceive were grounds for denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

An adversary proceeding was before the court upon the Complaint filed by plaintiff trustee objecting to the discharge of defendant debtors. The objection to discharge was grounded on 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A), (a)(2)(B) and (a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roberts v. Montgomery (In re Montgomery) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-137

Behnke v. Murphy (In re Murphy)

Ruling
Errors and omissions in schedules by financially unsophisticated debtors were not grounds for denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed a complaint against chapter 7 debtors, seeking a denial of debtors'discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A), alleging that debtors knowingly and fraudulently made false oaths in connection with their chapter 7 case.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Behnke v. Murphy (In re Murphy) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 27, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-136