Skip to main content

§ 727(a)(4)(A)

Krywopusk v. Raftogianis (In re Raftogianis)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to numerous errors, omissions and inconsistencies demonstrating reckless indifference to truth.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed a complaint against defendant chapter 7 debtor, seeking denial of the debtor's discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Krywopusk v. Raftogianis (In re Raftogianis) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-060

In re Fraleigh

Ruling
Objection to discharge denied based on debtor's failure to disclose live-in companion overruled where debtor relied on advice of counsel and contribution was minimal.
Procedural posture

The former spouse of a chapter 7 debtor objected to her discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A), contending that she knowingly and fraudulently made a false oath or account by failing to disclose her live-in boyfriend's presence as a household member and his alleged contribution to the support of herself and her dependents on the means test and schedules.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fraleigh Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-029

Layng v. Benkowski (In re Benkowski)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to failure to disclose inheritance, other assets or transfer of business within two years of petition date.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff United States Trustee (UST) filed a complaint against defendant chapter 7 debtor seeking to deny his discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A) based upon the debtor's false oath.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Layng v. Benkowski (In re Benkowski) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 05, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-129

United States Trustee v. Gainey (In re Gainey)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to continuing failure to disclose marine assets.
Procedural posture

After debtors won a discharge in a no-asset chapter 7 case, the U.S. trustee (UST), filed an adversary complaint to deny a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A) and 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2). The underlying issue related to debtors' continuing failure to disclose their ownership of certain marine assets including a marine boat, two jet skis and a pontoon boat, all of which property grossed $23,000 when later sold at auction.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States Trustee v. Gainey (In re Gainey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2012 , LexisNexis #0312-057

In re Pepper

Ruling
Discharge denied due to gross understatement of income and retirement accounts and omission of investments from schedules.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary proceeding alleging that defendant debtors were not entitled to a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A) because they knowingly filed schedules that misstated their incomes and failed to disclose certain transactions assets.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pepper Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 02, 2011 , LexisNexis #1211-020

Stevenson v. Taylor (In re Taylor)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court properly denied discharge due to debtor's cavalier attitude to disclosure requirements.
Procedural posture

Trustee filed a complaint in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, seeking to deny defendant chapter 7 debtor a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4) based on alleged nondisclosures. The bankruptcy court entered an order denying discharge. The debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Stevenson v. Taylor (In re Taylor) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 26, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-060

Keeton v. Sohal (In re Sohal)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to omissions and misstatements in schedules.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff judgment creditor brought an adversary action against defendant debtors, husband and wife, asking that the debtors' discharges be denied under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Keeton v. Sohal (In re Sohal) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 23, 2011 , LexisNexis #1111-127

Estate of Bishop v. Mulholland (In re Mulholland)

Ruling
Debtor vending machine business operator denied discharge due to false statements and omissions from schedules.
Procedural posture

Creditors filed a complaint against chapter 7 debtors objecting to discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Estate of Bishop v. Mulholland (In re Mulholland) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 16, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-127

Lussier v. Sullivan (In re Sullivan)

Ruling
Discharge properly denied due to omission and undervaluation of assets.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor sought review of an order from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts denying his discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lussier v. Sullivan (In re Sullivan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 08, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-022

Davis v. Weddington (In re Weddington)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to material omission of new job and income.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff Chapter 7 trustee filed a complaint objecting to defendant Chapter 7 debtor's discharge pursuant to various provisions of 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a). He also sought to expand the debtor's Chapter 7 estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 348(f)(2), he objected to the debtor's exemption of his hunting equipment as a tool of the trade under Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-2304(e). The trustee moved for partial summary judgment on his false oath claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Davis v. Weddington (In re Weddington) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 07, 2011 , LexisNexis #1011-097