Skip to main content

§ 727(a)(2)

Marchetti v. Hines (In re Hines)

Ruling
Reconsideration of denial of discharge denied where debtor could not explain why evidence sought to be presented could not have been presented at original hearing.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 debtor filed a motion to reconsider an order granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff creditors and denying his discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marchetti v. Hines (In re Hines) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 30, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-093

United States Trustee v. Vigil (In re Vigil)

Ruling
Discharge denied due to undisclosed property later transferred to debtor's father and false oaths.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtors seeking a denial of the debtors' discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2), (4) based on the debtors' failure to disclose ownership of real property and false oaths made by the debtors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United States Trustee v. Vigil (In re Vigil) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #1109-091

Wayne Bank v. Johnson (In re Johnson)

Ruling
Motion for denial of discharge denied due to issue of fact regarding auto loans.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bank filed an adversary proceeding against defendant chapter 7 debtor, seeking an order denying the debtor's discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A). The debtor filed a motion for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wayne Bank v. Johnson (In re Johnson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 23, 2009 , LexisNexis #1109-058

Montedonico v. Beckham (In re Beckham)

Ruling
Denial of discharge upheld based on debtor's concealment of interest in tractor and subsequent postpetition sale.
Procedural posture

In an order granting plaintiff trustee's motion for partial summary judgment, the bankruptcy court for the Western District of Tennessee denied defendant debtor a discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 727(a)(2)(A) and (B) and 727(a)(4)(A) for fraudulently concealing her own property and property of the estate and for knowingly and fraudulently making false oaths in connection with her bankruptcy case. The debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Montedonico v. Beckham (In re Beckham) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 19, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-104

In re Herman

Ruling
Discharge denied due to debtor's concealment of assets and false statements.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff judgment creditors brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor seeking a denial of the debtor's discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2), (4) based on the debtor's transfer and concealment of assets and the debtor's omissions in her bankruptcy schedules.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Herman Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 24, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-104

Smith v. Cooper (In re Cooper)

Ruling
Motion to deny discharge granted against debtor but not against debtor spouse who was not involved in improper stock transaction.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditors filed an adversary proceeding against defendant chapter 7 debtors, a husband and wife, seeking a judgment that debts the debtors owed were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a), that the debtors should be denied a discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), and (a)(5). A trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate, and he supported the creditors' objections to discharge under § 727.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Smith v. Cooper (In re Cooper) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 13, 2009 , LexisNexis #0309-127

Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey)

Ruling
Creditor who did not object to discharge could not seek denial of discharge after discharge had been granted.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor brought an action against defendant chapter 7 debtors, a husband and wife, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2) and § 523(a)(2)(A). A motion to dismiss filed on behalf of the wife was granted, leaving the husband as the only remaining defendant.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-050

Antognoni v. Basso (In re Basso)

Ruling
Denial of discharge on theory of "continuing concealment" reversed as homestead declaration announced, rather than hid, interest in property.
Procedural posture

Debtor appealed from an order of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts that denied his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A) and sustained plaintiff creditor's objection to his homestead exemption. The court denied the debtor's discharge under the continuous concealment doctrine, and denied the homestead exemption because he had filed the declaration of homestead in violation of a state court order.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Antognoni v. Basso (In re Basso) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 09, 2008 , LexisNexis #0309-034

Standefer v. Kent (In re Kent)

Ruling
Transfers with intent to hinder, delay and defraud creditors warranted denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, creditors of defendant chapter 7 debtors, a husband and wife, filed a complaint against the debtors, objecting, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A), to the issuance of a discharge to the debtors and objecting, pursuant to several provisions of 11 U.S.C.S. § 523, to the dischargeability of the debt owed to the creditors by the debtors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Standefer v. Kent (In re Kent) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 22, 2008 , LexisNexis #0109-056

Harris v. DAmico (In re DAmico)

Ruling
Schedule inaccuracies due to oversight which were remedied at creditors' meeting were not basis for denial of discharge.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff bankruptcy trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtors seeking a denial of the debtors' discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(A), (4)(A) based on the debtors' failure to disclose prepetition transfers. The bankruptcy court conducted a trial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harris v. DAmico (In re DAmico) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 09, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-033