Skip to main content

Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey)

Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey)

Ruling
Creditor who did not object to discharge could not seek denial of discharge after discharge had been granted.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor brought an action against defendant chapter 7 debtors, a husband and wife, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2) and § 523(a)(2)(A). A motion to dismiss filed on behalf of the wife was granted, leaving the husband as the only remaining defendant.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Susman Entmt Inc. v. Carey (In re Carey) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0209-050