Skip to main content

Rule 3001(c)(2)

Lemay, In re

Ruling
Claim allowed based on itemized statement provided along with later supplemental itemization and debtor’s failure to provide evidence supporting disallowance. (Bankr. D. Me.)
Issue(s)
Proof of Claim; Supporting Information; Additional Requirements; Prepetition Interest, Fees, Expenses or Other Charges.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lemay, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 20, 2025 , LexisNexis #0825-099

Moore v. Am. Express Bank FSB (In re Moore)

Ruling
Proofs of claim filed by credit card company were not entitled to prima facie validity except to the extent supported by original applications and agreements.
Issue(s)
Were proofs of claim filed by credit card company entitled to prima facie validity?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moore v. Am. Express Bank FSB (In re Moore) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 22, 2016 , LexisNexis #0416-103

In re Davenport

Ruling
Creditor not estopped from collecting prepetition arrears on promissory note not included in proof of claim or provided for in debtor's chapter 13 plan.
Issue(s)
Was creditor estopped from collecting prepetition interest arrears that were not included in its proof of claim or provided for in debtor's chapter 13 plan?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Davenport Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 31, 2015 , LexisNexis #0116-136

In re Jimenez

Ruling
Bank sanctioned for inclusion of unitemized appraisal costs and expenses in proof of claim.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a bank filed a claim against the debtor's bankruptcy estate. The debtor filed an objection to the bank's proof of claim, alleging that the bank failed to properly itemize pre-petition interest, fees, expenses, and other charges included in the amount of its claim, as required under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(c)(2)(A). The court held a hearing on the debtor's objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jimenez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 01, 2013 , LexisNexis #0213-137

In re McCormack

Ruling
Failure to provide itemized statement of interest, fees, expenses or charges incurred prepetition was not grounds for disallowance of proof of claim.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee filed an objection to a proof of claim filed by a creditor on the grounds that the creditor failed to provide an itemized statement of interest, fees, expenses, or charges incurred before the debtors' petition was filed. The trustee sought an order striking the claim to the extent it failed to comply with Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3001(c)(2)(D)(ii).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McCormack Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0412-035