Consumer

Ritter, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors were not entitled to an immediate COVID-19 discharge despite stipulation totemporarily suspend plan payments due to decrease in income. (Bankr. C.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ritter, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2021, LexisNexis #0421-072

Glodowski, In re

Ruling: 
Motion for sanctions granted where movant met her burden of proof to establish that the casewas filed for an improper purpose, including to delay the parties' divorce and to increase costs.(Bankr. D. Neb.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Glodowski, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2021, LexisNexis #0421-074

Pervacio, Inc., In re

Ruling: 
Proposed settlement approved as reasonable and is in the best interests of the estate. (Bankr. D.Del.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pervacio, Inc., In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 22,2021, LexisNexis #0421-075

Taiwo, In re

Ruling: 
Counsel's application was granted in part because awarding the full requested fee would beunreasonable due to failure to achieve a confirmable plan. (Bankr. D.D.C.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Taiwo, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 04,2021, LexisNexis #0421-053

Caires, In re--JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Caires

Ruling: 
Creditor's motion for relief from stay was denied as moot as creditor had already obtainedrelief from stay to pursue a state foreclosure action. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caires, In re--JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Caires. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2021, LexisNexis #0421-057

Hardman, In re

Ruling: 
Creditor was not entitled to stay relief as there was insufficient evidence to determine that thetruck was not necessary to an effective reorganization even if debtor had no equity in thetruck. (Bankr. D. Utah)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hardman, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2021, LexisNexis #0421-058

Ganske, In re

Ruling: 
Debtors could not assume contract that was properly terminated before debtors' bankruptcywas filed. (Bankr. E.D. Wis.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ganske, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2021, LexisNexis #0421-059

Trueblood, In re--Marshall Recovery II LLC v. Trueblood

Ruling: 
Debt was nondischargeable where creditor relied on debtor’s false representations to purchasereceivables. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Trueblood, In re--Marshall Recovery II LLC v. Trueblood. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 04,2021, LexisNexis #0421-039

Fontanez, In re--Stratford v. Fontanez

Ruling: 
A portion of a default judgment was not nondischargeable based on the issue-preclusive effectof state court default judgment. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fontanez, In re--Stratford v. Fontanez. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 01,2021, LexisNexis #0421-040

McMartin, In re--BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. McMartin

Ruling: 
Bank was not entitled to denial of discharge as it did not show that the debtor farmer madematerially false written statements about its financial condition to induce the loans. (Bankr.D.N.D.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McMartin, In re--BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. McMartin. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court: Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 26,2021, LexisNexis #0421-041

Pages

Subscribe to Consumer