- 11 U.S.C.
In re Wardrobe
Mar
16
2009
Ruling
When stay was lifted solely to allow state court consideration of claims against debtor's bonding companies, resulting judgment did not have preclusive effect.
Procedural posture
Appellant creditor appealed the judgment of the Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel that reversed a bankruptcy court's decision that a state court judgment was entitled to preclusive effect and that the creditor stated a cause of action under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) against appellee debtor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wardrobe Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available