Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge dunn

In re Culpepper

Ruling
Attorneys' fees and costs awarded for violation of discharge injunction.
Procedural posture

Following the entry of an order granting the chapter 7 debtor wife's motion for an order of civil contempt based on a creditor's violation of the discharge injunction, the court held a hearing on the request of the debtor's counsel for an award of attorneys' fees and costs under 11 U.S.C.S. § 330. The creditor objected to the request.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Culpepper Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 11, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-004

Black v. Bonnie Springs Family Ltd. (In re Black)

Ruling
Nondischargeability of state court judgment for abuse of process and nuisance affirmed.
Procedural posture

Appellees, creditors, moved for summary judgment on their complaint against appellants, debtors, to except debts from discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6). The debts arose from a state court judgment against both debtors for abuse of process and against one debtor for nuisance. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada granted summary judgment in the creditors' favor. Debtors appealed the bankruptcy court's summary judgment order.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Black v. Bonnie Springs Family Ltd. (In re Black) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 11, 2013 , LexisNexis #0413-014

Hosseini v. Key Bank (In re Hosseini)

Ruling
Debtor not entitled to authorize fees after prevailing in proceeding to establish dischargeability of student loan debt.
Issue(s)
Should debtor be allowed attorneys' fees incurred in successful proceeding to have student loan debt declared dischargeable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hosseini v. Key Bank (In re Hosseini) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-127

Leavitt v. Finney (In re Finney)

Ruling
Confirmation reversed due to bankruptcy court error in concluding that debtor was entitled to discharge in chapter 13 case after receiving discharge in prior case converted to chapter 7.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 trustee appealed the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada's confirmation of appellee debtor's chapter 13 Plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Leavitt v. Finney (In re Finney) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-134

In re Marine Servs. Corp.

Ruling
Debtors' attorneys' fees allowed with five percent reduction due to filing errors and pending dismissal.
Procedural posture

Debtors, a marine services company and two affiliated businesses, filed separate petitions under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The court ordered administrative consolidation of the debtors' cases, and after most of the debtors' assets were sold it held a hearing on the debtors' motion to dismiss their cases and to consider four "interim" applications for legal fees and expenses that were filed by a law firm that represented the debtors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Marine Servs. Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 18, 2012 , LexisNexis #0113-004

In re Culpepper

Ruling
Bank's continuing contacts with debtor regarding refinancing debt violated discharge injunction.
Procedural posture

Debtors, a husband and wife, filed a motion to reopen their chapter 7 bankruptcy case, and after the court granted their motion, they filed a motion seeking an order holding a bank in contempt for violating the injunction that was imposed pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(a)(2) when their debts were discharged. The husband withdrew from the debtors' contempt motion, and the bank filed a motion for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Culpepper Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 05, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-020

Beal Bank USA v. Windmill Durango Office LLC (In re Windmill Durango Office LLC)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in denying creditor's motion to change ballot accepting debtor's plan.
Procedural posture

Appellant bank (creditor) challenged two orders of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada concerning appellee debtor's chapter 11 plan. Specifically, it appealed the bankruptcy court's order ("ballot order") denying its motion to permit it to change a ballot accepting debtor's plan ("ballot motion"). It also appealed the bankruptcy court's order confirming debtor's chapter 11 plan ("plan confirmation order") over its objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Beal Bank USA v. Windmill Durango Office LLC (In re Windmill Durango Office LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 27, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-135

Levesque v. Shapiro (In re Levesque)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not abuse discretion in denying debtors' motion to convert to chapter 11 due to untruths.
Procedural posture

Appellant chapter 7 debtors sought review of a judgment from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, which granted their motion to reopen their case but denied their motion to convert to chapter 11. On appeal, the debtors argued that appellee chapter 7 trustee had no standing to be heard with respect to the motions because he had filed his final report and been discharged.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Levesque v. Shapiro (In re Levesque) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 25, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-129

Paulson v. Arbaugh (In re Paulson)

Ruling
Trustee was not liable for acting within scope of authority with notice to debtor and approval of bankruptcy court in settling lawsuit on behalf of estate.
Procedural posture

In his complaint, plaintiff debtor alleged that defendant trustee was liable for "civil conspiracy" in connection with her settlement of a "Predatory Lending Lawsuit" with a creditor in exchange for the creditor's payment of $5,000 to debtor's bankruptcy estate, and that her actions constituted the intentional infliction of emotional distress upon debtor for which she must be personally accountable. The Trustee moved for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Paulson v. Arbaugh (In re Paulson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 11, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-002

Warfield v. Salazar (In re Salazar)

Ruling
Refund received and spent prior to conversion from chapter 13 to chapter 7 properly held not to be property of the estate.
Procedural posture

Trustee challenged a ruling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona denying a motion to compel appellee debtors, who had filed a chapter 13 that was converted to a chapter 7, to pay over funds received as a tax refund during the pendency of the chapter 13 case. Debtors had successfully claimed that as they had spent the funds, the refund no longer constituted "estate property" per 11 U.S.C.S. § 348(f)(1)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Warfield v. Salazar (In re Salazar) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 05, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-114