Judge Klein

Dao, In re

Ruling: 
Court granted Chapter 7 trustee's 11 U.S.C. § 362(h)(2) motion so as to preserve the automaticstay with respect to personal property of the estate of the individual debtor. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dao, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 11,2020, LexisNexis #0620-080

LeGrand, In re

Ruling: 
Creditor and debt collector were liable for willful stay violations as they knew that a dischargehad been entered and any continued garnishments would violate such discharge order. (Bankr.E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of LeGrand, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 06,2020, LexisNexis #0320-058

Murray, In re

Ruling: 
Objection to discharge was overruled as there was no evidence to support a finding offraudulent intent. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Murray, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 20,2019, LexisNexis #0120-091

Dragnea, In re--Dragnea v. Dragnea

Ruling: 
Chapter 11 plan could extinguish nondischargeable marital settlement agreement debtpursuant to modification agreed to by former spouse in debtor’s plan. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dragnea, In re--Dragnea v. Dragnea. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 29,2019, LexisNexis #1219-066

Filice, In re--Filice v. United States

Ruling: 
Court reopened debtor's second chapter 7 bankruptcy case and vacated the discharge order that was entered as a clerical mistake. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Filice, In re--Filice v. United States. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 18,2018, LexisNexis #0218-120

Sundquist, In re--Sundquist v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Ruling: 
Court approved confidential settlement between debtors and a bank. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sundquist, In re--Sundquist v. Bank of Am., N.A.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 18,2018, LexisNexis #0218-092

Sundquist v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Ruling: 
Bank sanctioned after it willfully violated automatic stay in foreclosing on debtors' residence, secretly rescinding the foreclosure, and failing to protect debtors' property from looting. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sundquist v. Bank of Am., N.A.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 23,2017, LexisNexis #0417-097

In re Fagan

Ruling: 
Obligation to repay unearned portion of military reenlistment bonus was excepted fromdischarge and therefore not the basis for an order enforcing the discharge injunction. (Bankr.E.D. Cal.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fagan. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 14,2016, LexisNexis #1216-053

United Healthcare Workers-West v. Borsos (In re Borsos)

Ruling: 
Restitution ordered for wage garnishment that violated the discharge injunction.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of United Healthcare Workers-West v. Borsos (In re Borsos). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on January 22,2016, LexisNexis #0216-083

Carpenter v. Montana Dept of Labor & Indus. Unemployment Ins. Div. Contributions Bureau (In re Carpenter)

Ruling: 
Order holding that state tax was an excise tax entitled to priority affirmed.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Carpenter v. Montana Dept of Labor & Indus. Unemployment Ins. Div. Contributions Bureau (In re Carpenter). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 18,2015, LexisNexis #1215-047

Pages

Subscribe to Judge Klein