Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge macdonald

In re Petrosine

Ruling
Exemptions disallowed due to deliberate concealment of assets.
Procedural posture

Objections to amended exemption claims asserted by debtor were filed by a creditor that was debtor's ex-employer and the chapter 7 trustee. At issue was whether the objectors had established, by the preponderance of the evidence required by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4003, that the exemptions were properly disallowed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Petrosine Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 13, 2012 , LexisNexis #1012-032

In re Harp

Ruling
Plan modification denied as retroactive and unfair to general unsecured creditors.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtors who fell behind in payments under their confirmed plan sought to reduce their monthly payments and extend the term of the plan. The debtors moved to modify their confirmed plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harp Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 20, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-067

In re Martech USA Inc.

Ruling
Fees of attorney who worked for chapter 7 trustee granted with reduction for work performed before employment was approved.
Procedural posture

An attorney who performed work for a chapter 7 trustee filed a final application for allowance of fees and costs, and an Assistant United States Trustee ("UST") filed an objection to the application, claiming, inter alia, that some fees the attorney billed were not allowable under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 330 and 704(a)(5). The court held a hearing on the UST's objections.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Martech USA Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 03, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-103

In re Freibel

Ruling
Case ordered converted or dismissed due to presumption of abuse.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss debtors' chapter 7 case for abuse under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(1) and (b)(2) or , alternatively, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(1) and (b)(3). Creditors filed a motion to dismiss under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(3)(A) and (b)(3)(B). Another creditor filed a notice of joinder in both motions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Freibel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 15, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-026

In re Hatten

Ruling
Stay pending appeal of distribution order denied due to lack of likelihood of success on merits.
Procedural posture

In a chapter 7 bankruptcy case, the court appointed a trustee to administer the debtor's bankruptcy estate and authorized the trustee to disburse funds that were in the bankruptcy estate in accordance with the distribution scheme set out in 11 U.S.C.S. § 726. The debtor filed a notice of appeal and asked the bankruptcy court to enter an order which prohibited the trustee from disbursing funds until the appeal was resolved.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hatten Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 10, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-035

In re Garrison

Ruling
Secured claim in vehicle purchased for business purposes could be bifurcated pursuant to hanging paragraph even if no longer used for such purposes.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtor filed a motion to value a creditor's security interest in the debtor's vehicle and bifurcate the creditor's secured claim into secured and unsecured components pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Garrison Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on June 01, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-120

In re Bossie

Ruling
From 22C did not provide sufficient or accurate basis for determining debtor's "projected disposable income."
Procedural posture

The debtors moved to confirm their proposed chapter 13 plan. The chapter 13 trustee recommended against confirmation. The issue was the proper calculation of the debtors'"projected disposable income"for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(2).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bossie Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 12, 2006 , LexisNexis #0407-011