Skip to main content

In re Harp

In re Harp

Ruling
Plan modification denied as retroactive and unfair to general unsecured creditors.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtors who fell behind in payments under their confirmed plan sought to reduce their monthly payments and extend the term of the plan. The debtors moved to modify their confirmed plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Harp Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 20, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-067