Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge schermer

McCarthy v. Brevik (In re McCarthy)

Ruling
Dismissal of debtor's avoidance proceeding for lack of standing reversed.
Issue(s)
Did bankruptcy court err in dismissing debtor's avoidance proceeding for lack of standing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McCarthy v. Brevik (In re McCarthy) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 28, 2013 , LexisNexis #1113-078

Schlehuber v. Fremont Natl Bank (In re Schlehuber)

Ruling
Conversion to chapter 11 based on individual debtor's ability to fund plan affirmed.
Procedural posture

Appellant chapter 11 debtor challenged a decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska, which converted his chapter 7 bankruptcy case to a case under chapter 11 pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 706(b).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schlehuber v. Fremont Natl Bank (In re Schlehuber) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 09, 2013 , LexisNexis #0513-021

Kelley v. Centennial Bank (In re Kelley)

Ruling
Order requiring debtor to convey property to bank did not call for §554 abandonment.
Procedural posture

Debtors challenged an order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas--Little Rock, requiring them to convey real property to bank.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kelley v. Centennial Bank (In re Kelley) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 30, 2013 , LexisNexis #0213-090

In re McIntosh

Ruling
Plan confirmed after deletion of language that differed from that in model plan.
Procedural posture

Both debtor and the chapter 13 trustee objected to confirmation of debtor's second amended chapter 13 Plan. Issues included whether the plan was properly confirmed despite the court's ordered deletion, based on the trustee's objection thereto, of language that debtor had added to Paragraph 10 of the court's model chapter 13 plan, adopted per Bankr. E.D. Mo. R. 3015-3(A) (Rule).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McIntosh Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 30, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-132

Copeland v. Fink (In re Copeland)

Ruling
Unsecured non-priority tax claim properly denied special treatment under confirmed plan.
Procedural posture

Debtors challenged the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri confirming their amended chapter 13 plan. Appellee was the Trustee.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Copeland v. Fink (In re Copeland) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 20, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-063

In re Finn

Ruling
Case dismissed for bad faith where debtor's partner transferred house to debtor after dismissal of partner's chapter 13 case without consideration.
Procedural posture

The servicer on a mortgage that encumbered residential property asked the court to dismiss a chapter 13 case filed by debtor on a finding of bad faith per 11 U.S.C.S. § 1307 or in the alternative, to grant relief from stay so that movant could enforce rights under the mortgage and related agreements. The issue was whether the totality of the circumstances relating to the case bespoke of bad faith sufficient to justify dismissal.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Finn Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 05, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-028

Walton v. Dellutri Law Group (In re Dellutri Law Group)

Ruling
Partial disgorgement of fees ordered by law firm for violations of disclosure requirements not willfully intended to deceive.
Procedural posture

The U.S. Trustee (UST), sought orders against respondent law firm finding that it had repeatedly violated the court's "no-look" order governing chapter 13 compensation, the court's "first day order" and that the firm was subject to sanctions by reason thereof. Specifically, the UST charged the firm with failing to make disclosures required by 11 U.S.C.S. § 329, Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2016 and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2017.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Walton v. Dellutri Law Group (In re Dellutri Law Group) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 26, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-108

Moore v. J&M Sec. LLC (In re Moore)

Ruling
Judicial lien avoided to the extent impairing debtor's homestead exemption.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 debtor sought to avoid the judicial lien of respondent creditor in its entirety under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(f). The creditor objected, but the holder of a junior consensual lien supported the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Moore v. J&M Sec. LLC (In re Moore) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 11, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-047

Kaler v. Charles (In re Charles)

Ruling
Discharge properly denied due to nondisclosures in statement of financial affairs.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor sought review of a ruling of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of North Dakota denying his discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(2)(B) and 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(a)(4)(A). Appellee trustee had prevailed below on claims, inter alia, that certain non-disclosures constituted false oaths meriting denial of discharge and that debtor had concealed property of the estate with the requisite intent.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kaler v. Charles (In re Charles) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 16, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-023

Bushnell v. Bank of the West (In re Bushnell)

Ruling
Relief from stay properly granted to bank that purchased debtor's home at foreclosure sale.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and the bank filed a motion seeking relief under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(d) from the stay that was imposed when the debtor declared bankruptcy. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska granted the bank's motion, and the debtor appealed.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bushnell v. Bank of the West (In re Bushnell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 08, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-118