Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge meyers

In re Polla

Ruling
Relief from stay granted due to debtor's ongoing failure to make payments on loan and lack of adequate protection.
Issue(s)
Was creditor secured by a lien on debtor's residence in which debtor claimed a homestead exemption for the difference between the value of the property and the secured claim entitled to relief from stay due to debtor's ongoing failure to make payments and lack of an equity cushion?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Polla Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 12, 2015 , LexisNexis #0715-008

In re Altmeyer

Ruling
Trustee's motion for sale of property free and clear denied as property had revested with debtor upon plan confirmation.
Issue(s)
Should trustee's postconfirmation motion for sale of estate property free and clear be granted?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Altmeyer Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 02, 2014 , LexisNexis #1014-115

Newberry v. United States (In re Newberry)

Ruling
Seizure of tax refund was a proper offset but violated stay.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor sued defendants, departments of the federal government, for a judgment that seizure of debtor's federal tax refund on account of an outstanding and unpaid mortgage deficiency judgment against plaintiff and her ex-husband was an improper offset per 11 U.S.C.S. § 553, that the action violated the automatic stay in 11 U.S.C.S. § 362, that she was entitled to orders turning that amount over to her and awarding § 362(k) damages

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Newberry v. United States (In re Newberry) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 19, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-038

IndianaKentucky Regional Council of Carpenters Joint Apprenticeship & Training Comm. v. Kesler (In re Kesler)

Ruling
Debt owed to apprenticeship and training trust fund was a nondischargeable educational loan.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff apprenticeship and training trust fund sued defendant chapter 7 debtor, alleging that the educational assistance received by the debtor from the fund qualified as an educational loan, and thus, was exempt from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(8)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of IndianaKentucky Regional Council of Carpenters Joint Apprenticeship & Training Comm. v. Kesler (In re Kesler) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-016

Simon v. Zittel

Ruling
Withdrawals from debtors' retirement accounts within six months of petition date were not "income."
Procedural posture

A trustee objected, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b)(1)(B), to confirmation of the debtors' proposed chapter 13 plans.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Simon v. Zittel Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 19, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-072

In re Franco

Ruling
Trustee's objection to confirmation overruled via application of good faith standards.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee filed an objection to confirmation of a plan, contending that the debtors should have been compelled to surrender one of three encumbered vehicles on the ground that it was not reasonable or necessary for them to retain a third vehicle.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Franco Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 12, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308-093

In re Herbord

Ruling
"Old car" expense set forth in IRS manual was not deductible from disposable income calculation.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtors who were above-median income debtors calculated their disposable income by deducting vehicle operation and ownership expenses, and also "old car" operating expenses for vehicles over six years old. The bankruptcy trustee asserted that the "old car" expenses were not deductible and objected to confirmation of the debtors' plans on the ground that not all disposable income was applied to pay creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Herbord Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 14, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308014

In re Trombetta

Ruling
Plan could be modified post-lien avoidance to allow benefit to priority unsecured creditors.
Procedural posture

Following the avoidance of a lien on the debtor's motor vehicle, the debtor proposed a modification to the plan. The chapter 13 trustee objected to the plan modification, asserting that the value received from avoidance must be directed to the exclusive benefit of the general unsecured creditors. The debtor countered that the priority unsecured claims must be paid in full before the general unsecured creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Trombetta Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 04, 2008 , LexisNexis #0208-103

In re Sallee

Ruling
Above median debtors not required to surrender two of four vechicles where plan was proposed in good faith as "reasonably necessary" inquiry does nto apply under BAPCPA.
Procedural posture

The chapter 13 trustee filed an objection to confirmation of the debtors'proposed plan. The trustee argued that the good faith standards set forth in 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(3) and (7) required the debtors to surrender two of their four vehicles. In the alternative, the trustee argued that the payments on the extra vehicles were not reasonable and necessary expenses.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sallee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 15, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-126

In re Barrett

Ruling
Debtor could claim housing and vehicle deduction in excess of actual expenditures.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 creditor objected to confirmation of the debtor's plan under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(2) on the grounds that the plan did not apply all of the debtor's projected disposable income to payments to unsecured creditors.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Barrett Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on July 10, 2007 , LexisNexis #0907-011