Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge mannes

Funkhouser v. Lowe (In re Lowe)

Ruling
Judgment in favor of personal representative was nondischargeable due to collateral estoppel.
Issue(s)
Whether judgment against debtor was dischargeable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Funkhouser v. Lowe (In re Lowe) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 20, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-045

Cissel v. Abell (In re Abell)

Ruling
Debt was nondischargeable due to fraud arising out of foreclosure rescue scheme.
Issue(s)
Debtor's agent purported to help homeowners avoid foreclosure, but actually bought the property and charged homeowners rent while failing to pay the delinquent mortgage. Did debtor's scheme render the resulting debt nondischargeable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cissel v. Abell (In re Abell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 15, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-115

Cissel v. Abell (In re Abell)

Ruling
Judgment for fraud an intentional infliction of emotional distress was nondischargeable due to collateral estoppel.
Issue(s)
Was judgment for fraud and intentional infliction of emotional distress based on debtor's foreclosure rescue scheme, pursuant to which debtor bought creditors' property, failed to pay mortgage and collected rents in excess of unpaid mortgage payments, nondischargeable.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cissel v. Abell (In re Abell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 15, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-041

Wilson v. Abell (In re Abell)

Ruling
Stay modified to allow judgment creditor to continue discovery efforts.
Procedural posture

Judgment creditor filed a motion seeking relief from the stay that was imposed pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a) when respondent debtor declared chapter 11 bankruptcy so she could continue discovery efforts to identify property from which she and other creditors could collect the balance of a $2,140,000 judgment they obtained in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia. The debtor opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wilson v. Abell (In re Abell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2013 , LexisNexis #0513-111

White v. Magellanes (In re Magellanes)

Ruling
Judgment debt was discharged in absence of false representation which could have led to creditor's loss.
Procedural posture

This case came before the court for trial on the adversary proceeding filed by creditors against defendant debtor seeking a ruling that the balance of $19,443 owed on a prepetition judgment in the original amount of $30,000 was excepted from discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of White v. Magellanes (In re Magellanes) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 01, 2013 , LexisNexis #0413-012

Carrollan Gardens Condo. Assn v. Khan (In re Khan)

Ruling
Condominium association entitled to relief from stay to collect postpetition obligations.
Issue(s)
Whether a condominium association was entitled o relief from the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a) to enable it to file legal action to collect post-filing obligations.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Carrollan Gardens Condo. Assn v. Khan (In re Khan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 06, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-109

In re Keita

Ruling
Plan providing for payment of note that matured prior to petition date could be confirmed.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtor sought confirmation of his plan, A creditor filed a motion to dismiss the case and, along with other creditors, filed objections to confirmation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Keita Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0113-033

In re Navarro

Ruling
Case dismissed where now deceased debtor failed to attend §341 meeting and proposed plan was not confirmable.
Procedural posture

A creditor holding a claim secured by a residence owned by debtor objected to debtor's proposed Chapter 13 plan, which plan was filed one day before debtor died. Issues included whether the plan was nonetheless confirmable, which was the outcome sought by debtor's next of kin, and whether the trustee's motion to dismiss, which was based on debtor's failure to attend the § 341 meeting of creditors and other factors, was properly granted.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Navarro Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 19, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-072

Wolff v. United States (In re Firstpay Inc.)

Ruling
Debtor payroll service's tax payments on behalf of clients paid with other client's funds were not avoidable.
Procedural posture

After a remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the court considered the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiff chapter 7 trustee and defendant United States in the trustee's action, which alleged that payments made by the debtor to the government were avoidable preferences under 11 U.S.C.S. § 547.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wolff v. United States (In re Firstpay Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 30, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-105

Gipson v. United States Dept of Educ. (In re Gipson)

Ruling
Student loan debt was nondischargeable due to lack of good faith and existence of income opportunities.
Procedural posture

A chapter 7 debtor filed a complaint against defendants, the U.S. Department of Education, a state agency, and a university, to determine the dischargeability of her student loans pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(8).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gipson v. United States Dept of Educ. (In re Gipson) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 15, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-083