Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge 9

Marklin, In re--Kerin Enters. Holding Co. v. Marklin

Ruling
Debtor's discharge was denied where he had a duty to disclose his retained interest in thebook of business he co-owned with his former employer and failed to do so. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial; Fraud; False Oath or Account by Debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marklin, In re--Kerin Enters. Holding Co. v. Marklin Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 27, 2023 , LexisNexis #1223-015