Skip to main content

§ 1334(c)

Baum, In re--Baum v. Baum

Ruling
Court abstained from ruling on plaintiff estate administrator's partial summary judgmentrequest as the majority of relevant factors and issues as to the property at issue had not yet tobeen fully resolved in the probate court. (Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Baum, In re--Baum v. Baum Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 22, 2022 , LexisNexis #0522-072

Gibbs, In re--Gibbs v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC

Ruling
Court abstained from ruling on proof of claim that involved issues currently pending in statecourt. (Bankr. N.D. Ga.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gibbs, In re--Gibbs v. Nationstar Mortg. LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 04, 2022 , LexisNexis #0422-094

PFO Global Inc., In re--VSP Labs, Inc. v. Hillair Capital Investments, L.P.

Ruling
Bankruptcy court would not have abused its discretion in refusing to abstain from hearing andruling on lift stay order as there was no timely motion for abstention. (5th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of PFO Global Inc., In re--VSP Labs, Inc. v. Hillair Capital Investments, L.P. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 09, 2022 , LexisNexis #0322-099

Young, In re--Young v. Houser

Ruling
Bankruptcy court abstained from hearing and determining claims asserted in the adversaryproceeding as state law issues predominated over bankruptcy issues and applicable state lawwas largely well-settled. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Young, In re--Young v. Houser Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 26, 2021 , LexisNexis #1221-069

Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, In re--Faulkner v. Lane Grorman Trubitt, LLC

Ruling
Equitable remand of a bankruptcy civil proceeding was appropriate as there was no longer abankruptcy estate to administer, a liquidating plan had been confirmed and comity weighedin favor of abstention and remand. (Bankr. N.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Reagor-Dykes Motors, LP, In re--Faulkner v. Lane Grorman Trubitt, LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 13, 2021 , LexisNexis #1221-046

KC7 Ranch, Ltd., In re--Ahern v. Griggs

Ruling
Permissive abstention and equitable remand were appropriate as there would have been noeffect on the efficient administration of the bankruptcy estate if the court abstained. (Bankr.N.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of KC7 Ranch, Ltd., In re--Ahern v. Griggs Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 10, 2021 , LexisNexis #1021-098

Hall, In re--Hall v. Hall

Ruling
Permissive abstention was warranted because issues as to whether a partnership existedunder state law and the rights of partners were plainly not exclusive to bankruptcy law.(Bankr. N.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hall, In re--Hall v. Hall Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 21, 2021 , LexisNexis #0921-024

Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing and determining the adversary proceeding challenging statecourt foreclosure action because abstention would not impact the administration of thedebtor's Chapter 7 case. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2021 , LexisNexis #0821-048

Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs.

Ruling
Court abstained from exercising further jurisdiction over the claims asserted in adversaryproceeding where Railworks factors weighed strongly in favor of abstention. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 28, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-071

Byrnes, In re--Byrnes v. Byrnes

Ruling
Stay of nondischargeability proceeding could not be granted until district court ruled onmotion to withdraw reference. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Byrnes, In re--Byrnes v. Byrnes Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 27, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-070