Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge chavez ruark

Kelly, In re

Ruling
Case dismissed with prejudice due to debtor’s abuse of the provisions, purpose, and spirit ofChapter 13. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Chapter 13.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kelly, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 11, 2023 , LexisNexis #0224-002

Tucker, In re--Tucker v. Brusznicki

Ruling
Tax foreclosure sale conducted under law did not constitute reasonably equivalent value andrequired a case-by-case factual analysis. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tucker, In re--Tucker v. Brusznicki Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 01, 2022 , LexisNexis #1222-017

Ibbott, In re

Ruling
Cause existed to convert or dismiss the debtor's bankruptcy case as the debt arising from twostate court money judgments was noncontingent and liquidated debt. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Who May Be a Debtor; Chapter 13.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ibbott, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 04, 2022 , LexisNexis #0522-001

Cisneros, In re

Ruling
Dismissal of debtor's Chapter 7 case was denied where court found debtor's error in stating hisnet income instead of his gross income to be inadvertent and nonmaterial. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Dismissal of a Case or Conversion to a Case Under Chapter 11 or 13; For Cause.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cisneros, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 25, 2021 , LexisNexis #1021-043

Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs.

Ruling
Court abstained from exercising further jurisdiction over the claims asserted in adversaryproceeding where Railworks factors weighed strongly in favor of abstention. (Bankr. D. Md.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pieterse, In re--Pieterse v. Tyler Donegan Duncan Real Estate Servs. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 28, 2021 , LexisNexis #0721-071