Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge 9

Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Ruling
Court abstained from hearing and determining the adversary proceeding challenging statecourt foreclosure action because abstention would not impact the administration of thedebtor's Chapter 7 case. (Bankr. D. Conn.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Discretionary Abstention.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caires, In re--Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2021 , LexisNexis #0821-048