Skip to main content

Hicks, In re

Hicks, In re

Ruling
Debtor was not entitled to a discharge as there was no credible evidence presented that thedebtor's repeated omissions in filings and testimony were the result of a mistake orinadvertence. (Bankr. W.D. Ky.)
Issue(s)
Discharge; Grounds for Denial.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hicks, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 24, 2023 , LexisNexis #1223-092