Skip to main content

Sexton v. PHEAA (In re Sexton)

Sexton v. PHEAA (In re Sexton)

Ruling
Law school loans were nondischargeable as debtors had not minimized expenses and had potential to earn more income.
Issue(s)
Did debtors meet the Brunner test for an undue hardship discharge of student loan debt?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sexton v. PHEAA (In re Sexton) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 24, 2014 , LexisNexis #1214-124