Skip to main content

In re King

In re King

Ruling
Plan that paid more to student loan creditors than to other unsecured creditors did not unfairly discriminate.
Procedural posture

A chapter 13 trustee filed an objection to the debtors' amended chapter 13 plan, alleging that the plan violated the unfair discrimination requirements of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(1) because student loan creditors would receive returns of 27 percent to 92 percent of the face amount of their claims, while non-student loan creditors would only recover 25 percent of their claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re King Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 23, 2011 , LexisNexis #1211-023