Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge hershner

Webster v. Coulter (In re Coulter)

Ruling
Debtor could not claim exemption for personal injury cause of action that was not properly disclosed in schedules.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed with an Amended Schedule C--Property Claimed As Exempt. The chapter 7 trustee filed an objection to the claimed exemptions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Webster v. Coulter (In re Coulter) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 25, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-017

In re Hall

Ruling
Fee dispute between personal injury lawyer and attorney who handled wrongful death case for estate over alleged prepetition fee sharing arrangement was a matter for state court.
Procedural posture

Movant attorney filed a motion for a potential administrative fee under 11 U.S.C.S. § 328(a) or § 330(a) and also a motion seeking disgorgement of attorneys' fees paid to respondent counsel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hall Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 24, 2009 , LexisNexis #1009-133

Shelton v. Granger (In re Granger)

Ruling
Damages and attorneys' fees resulting from debtor's fraud and provision of false financial statements to creditor were nondischargeable.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditors filed an adversary complaint for a determination that the damages and attorney fees incurred as a result of defendant debtor's fraud and false statements was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shelton v. Granger (In re Granger) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 30, 2008 , LexisNexis #0808-077

Harris v. Brown (In re Brown)

Ruling
Debtor's brother sanctioned for frivolous and mertiless filings.
Procedural posture

Before the court was movant chapter 7 trustee's motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011(c) against respondent, debtor's brother, who had a one-third interest in the assets and liabilities of debtor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harris v. Brown (In re Brown) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 11, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-139

Harris v. United States (In re Brown)

Ruling
Debtor sanctioned for repeated filing of frivolous, meritless, and harassing motions against trustee.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff/movant trustee filed an adversary proceeding to determine the extent and validity of defendant United States' (acting through the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)) claim for taxes and for criminal restitution. Pending was the trustee's motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011(c). Respondent debtor did not file a response.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harris v. United States (In re Brown) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 14, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308-105

In re McEver

Ruling
Fact that colleague at former law firm had served as officer of two corporations of which debtor was a shareholder was not grounds for disqualification of counsel.
Procedural posture

Movant, the Acting United States Trustee (UST), filed a motion to set aside an order that granted the application to employ counsel for the debtor. The UST contended that counsel was disqualified from representing the debtor because an attorney in counsel's former law firm would have been disqualified.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re McEver Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 12, 2008 , LexisNexis #0308-076

In re Adams

Ruling
Vehicle purchased primarily for use of non-debtor spouse was not subject to anti-bifurcation provisions of "hanging paragraph."
Procedural posture

The debtor moved for confirmation of his proposed chapter 13 plan. The creditor, which held a security interest in the debtor's vehicle which the debtor purchased within 910 days of the date that he filed for bankruptcy relief, filed an objection. The creditor objected to the plan's bifurcation of its claim. The issue concerned the interpretation of the unnumbered, hanging paragraph following 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(9).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Adams Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 01, 2007 , LexisNexis #0407-047

Capital One Auto Fin. v. Bivins (In re Bivins)

Ruling
Secured creditor could not claim deficiency where debtor surrendered vehicle in full satisfaction of claim.
Procedural posture

Respondent debtor petitioned for relief under chapter 13 and filed a plan for confirmation. Movant creditor, who had provided financing for the debtor's car, objected to the confirmation when the debtor proposed returning the car for satisfaction of the debtor's claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Capital One Auto Fin. v. Bivins (In re Bivins) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-120

In re Dillard

Ruling
Motion to extend stay denied as to creditor that foreclosed on debtor's property after prior bankruptcy was dismissed for failure to comply with credit counselling requirement.
Procedural posture

After a foreclosure deed conveyed the interest of movant debtor in her residence to a creditor, a special warranty deed was filed that conveyed the creditor's interest in the residence to respondent guarantor, who had guaranteed the debtor's obligation to the creditor. In her second bankruptcy proceeding, the debtor filed a motion to extend the stay under 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3), the guarantor opposed this extension.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Dillard Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on February 07, 2007 , LexisNexis #0307-006

In re Total Woman Healthcare Ctr. PC

Ruling
Appointment of health care ombudsman not necessary where patient care was not affected by debtor's bankruptcy.
Procedural posture

The United States Trustee ("UST") filed a motion for a determination as to whether the debtor was a health care business and, if so, for the appointment of a patient care ombudsman pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 333. The UST contended that the debtor was a "health care business" and an ombudsman was necessary. The debtor objected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Total Woman Healthcare Ctr. PC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on December 14, 2006 , LexisNexis #0207-039