Skip to main content

Armstrong v. Lasalle Bank Natl Assn

Armstrong v. Lasalle Bank Natl Assn

Ruling
Bank could not claim retroactive postpetition, postconfirmation interest payment change where notice was not timely filed.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed a notice of post-petition payment change which provided for multiple payment changes over a period of years on the debtor's mortgage. The debtor filed an objection to the notice as being late filed and untimely and requested a finding that the creditor was limited to the monthly payment as provided for in the amended chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Armstrong v. Lasalle Bank Natl Assn Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 08, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-033