Skip to main content

Provident Bank v. Merrick (In re Merrick)

Provident Bank v. Merrick (In re Merrick)

Ruling
Debtor's misrepresentations regarding ownership of mortgaged property did not result in nondischargeable debt where creditor had access to accurate records.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor sued defendant chapter 7 debtor, alleging, inter alia, that the debtor's obligation under a mortgage was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Provident Bank v. Merrick (In re Merrick) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on August 11, 2006 , LexisNexis #1106-024