Skip to main content

§ 726(a)(2)(C)

Gaffney, In re

Ruling
Creditor's tardy claim could not be allowed as creditor received actual notice of thebankruptcy filing in time to inquire, learn of the claims filing deadline, and file a timelyclaim. (Bankr. C.D. Ill.)
Issue(s)
Distribution of Property of the Estate; Order of Distribution; Allowed Unsecured

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Gaffney, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 29, 2020 , LexisNexis #1120-044

Franklin, In re

Ruling
Court noted that it was inappropriate for the judiciary to bear the expense of a second notice to creditors who have otherwise sat on their rights and shown no interest in participating in a distribution from the bankruptcy estate. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Distribution of Property of the Estate; Order of Distribution; Allowed Unsecured Claims; Tardily Filed Proof of Claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Franklin, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 26, 2018 , LexisNexis #1118-052

Maui Indus. Loan & Fin. Co., In re

Ruling
Court ordered that all timely claims be paid first before untimely-filed claims of investors. (Bankr. D. Haw.)
Issue(s)
Distribution of Property of the Estate; Order of Distribution; Allowed Unsecured Claims; Tardily Filed Proof of Claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Maui Indus. Loan & Fin. Co., In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on September 07, 2017 , LexisNexis #1017-047

In re Sunland Inc.

Ruling
Late filed proof of claim had to be subordinated due to creditor's actual knowledge of the bar date and failure to inquire as to inclusion in matrix.
Issue(s)
Should late-filed proof of claim of creditor with actual personal knowledge of debtor's bankruptcy but who was not included in debtor's mailing matrix be allowed?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sunland Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 10, 2015 , LexisNexis #0815-060

In re Colonial Brokerage Inc.

Ruling
Late-filed proofs of claim allowed due to insufficient notice of bankruptcy and bar date.
Procedural posture

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") filed a motion seeking a determination that its claims, which were filed after the claims bar date, be accorded equal treatment with timely filed claims. The chapter 7 trustee filed an objection to the motion. After having filed a joint stipulation of relevant facts, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Colonial Brokerage Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 17, 2013 , LexisNexis #0713-125

In re Schauer

Ruling
Creditor with actual notice and knowledge of bankruptcy filing could not file a late proof of claim.
Procedural posture

A claimant filed a proof of claim on behalf of the custodian of his Individual Retirement Account (creditor). He moved the court for allowance of his claim under 11 U.S.C.S. § 726(a)(2)(C), arguing that he did not have notice or actual knowledge in time to file a timely claim. The Trustee and a bank objected.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Schauer Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 21, 2012 , LexisNexis #1212-056

In re Minnix Constr. Inc.

Ruling
Debtor's accounting firm, which was not employed by trustee, held a general unsecured claim for fees.
Procedural posture

The chapter 7 trustee objected to a priority unsecured claim filed by claimant, an accounting firm that had provided services to debtor both before and after the filing of debtor's chapter 7 case. At issue was whether the claim was properly classified as a priority unsecured claim or if, as urged by the trustee, some part of it was properly allowed as an unsecured claim and some part was properly disallowed in its entirety.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Minnix Constr. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on December 20, 2011 , LexisNexis #0412-139

In re Winter Mfg.

Ruling
Late filed proof of claim allowed due to lack of service of notice of case or bar date.
Procedural posture

In a debtor's chapter 7 case, movant creditors filed a motion to enlarge the time to file a proof of claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Winter Mfg. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 02, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-126

In re Cincom iOutsource Inc.

Ruling
Proof of claim failed after creditor was added to amended schedule was deemed timely.
Procedural posture

Debtor corporation filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a trustee was appointed to represent the bankruptcy estate. Movant creditor filed a proof of claim after the deadline established by the court, and moved for an order deeming its proof of claim as timely. The trustee and another creditor opposed the creditor's motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cincom iOutsource Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 20, 2008 , LexisNexis #0109-021

In re Neilsen

Ruling
Creditor with notice who failed to advise court of correct mailing address was not entitled to file late proof of claim based on failure of notice of distribution.
Procedural posture

Creditor filed a motion to allow a late filed proof of claim, seeking a ruling that the tardily filed claim could be treated as a timely filed claim and share in distributions pro rata with timely filed claims under 11 U.S.C. § 726(a)(2)(C).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Neilsen Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 22, 2006 , LexisNexis #0107-066