Skip to main content

§ 1322(b)(11)

Revels, In re

Mar
20
2020
Ruling
Confirmation of plan was denied as it include a provision that was inconsistent with theBankruptcy Code. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Discretionary Provisions; Provisions Consistent with Title 11.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Revels, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 20, 2020 , LexisNexis #0520-047
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

Mank, In re

Mar
10
2020
Ruling
Confirmation of amended plan denied as its contents include nonstandard provisions thatwere not specific to the debtor's financial circumstances. (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
Issue(s)
Contents of Plan; Discretionary Provisions; Provisions Consistent with Title 11.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mank, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 10, 2020 , LexisNexis #0420-095
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

In re Fielding

Apr
09
2015
Ruling
Debtors could apply proceeds from the sale of an exempt asset to tax debt owed to the IRS at their own discretion.
Issue(s)
Whether a debtor may apply, at his or her own discretion, proceeds from the sale of an exempt asset to tax debt owed to the IRS.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fielding Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 09, 2015 , LexisNexis #0515-029
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

In re Soto

Jan
26
2013
Ruling
Plan could not include language requiring periodic status reports by secured lenders.
Procedural posture

When a chapter 13 plan proposed by debtors, a married couple, included language requiring secured lenders, presumably including objector bank, to provide debtors with certain periodic information as to the status of the mortgage obligation, the lender objected. Issues included the relationship of the proposed language to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 3002.1 and whether 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(11) authorized inclusion of such a provision.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Soto Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 26, 2013 , LexisNexis #0213-099
LexisNexis Article
Learn More

In re Paquette

Nov
21
2011
Ruling
Objection to confirmation of plan including 180-day limit to amend deficiency claims overruled.
Procedural posture

This matter was before the court on a mortgage creditor's Objection to Confirmation of Debtors' proposed Chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Paquette Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 21, 2011 , LexisNexis #1211-059
LexisNexis Article
Learn More
Subscribe to %1