Skip to main content

§ 1305(b)

Curtis, In re--Hurst v. Curtis

Ruling
Agreed order was unambiguous as it was limited to arranging for partial payment ofplaintiffs' claim through defendants' plan but without the discharge of the balance thatnormally would have occurred at the end of the first case. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn.)
Issue(s)
Filing and Allowance of Post-petition Claims; Applicability of Section 502.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Curtis, In re--Hurst v. Curtis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 04, 2022 , LexisNexis #0722-021