Skip to main content

§ 1305

Curtis, In re--Hurst v. Curtis

Ruling
Agreed order was unambiguous as it was limited to arranging for partial payment ofplaintiffs' claim through defendants' plan but without the discharge of the balance thatnormally would have occurred at the end of the first case. (Bankr. E.D. Tenn.)
Issue(s)
Filing and Allowance of Post-petition Claims; Applicability of Section 502.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Curtis, In re--Hurst v. Curtis Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 04, 2022 , LexisNexis #0722-021

Nacci, In re

Ruling
Court allowed debtor to borrow money for their daughter's student loan as it would not impact their confirmed plan. (Bankr. N.D. Ohio)
Issue(s)
Filing and Allowance of Post-petition Claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Nacci, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 05, 2018 , LexisNexis #0818-055

In re Girardeau

Ruling
Chapter 13 debtors could not file proofs of claim on behalf of creditors for postpetition medical debts.
Issue(s)
Whether debtors could file proofs of claim on behalf of postpetition health care creditors, and whether such claims may be allowed and paid under the chapter 13 plan?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Girardeau Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 16, 2015 , LexisNexis #1215-096

In re DeVries

Ruling
Debtor could not file a proof of claim on behalf of the IRS for taxes incurred and payable after petition date.
Issue(s)
Could debtors file a proof of claim on behalf of the IRS for taxes incurred and payable after the petition date?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re DeVries Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 28, 2015 , LexisNexis #0515-100

In re White

Ruling
Debtors could not file involuntary proof of claim on behalf of state for postpetition taxes.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtors filed a proposed modification of their plan, a motion for an order of release of the lien of a state, and an involuntary claim on behalf of the state.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re White Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2012 , LexisNexis #1112-132

In re Turner

Ruling
Whether a tax claim in a chapter 13 case is prepetition or postpetition is determined by due date.
Procedural posture

A debtor filed a voluntary chapter 13 petition. After confirmation, the debtor filed a priority claim on behalf of the State of Michigan Department of Treasury (Treasury) for his 2008 tax obligation. The Treasury objected to the claim, contending that the 2008 tax obligation was a postpetition liability pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1305 and that the claim should be disallowed as a prepetition claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Turner Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 21, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-095

In re Jones

Ruling
IRS could not be forced to add postpetition tax liability to proof of claim for prepetition liabilities.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 debtor filed an objection to a proof of claim filed by the IRS.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Jones Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 04, 2007 , LexisNexis #0108-033

California Franchise Tax Bd. v. Joyce (In re Joyce)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in holding that state tax authority could not collect taxes where debtor's return was filed after claims bar date.
Procedural posture

Appellants, the State of California Franchise Tax Board and its executive director ("FTB"), sought review of an order from the bankruptcy court denying FTB's motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of appellee chapter 13 debtors in the debtors'adversary action seeking a determination that the debtors'year 2000 taxes were discharged and an injunction enjoining the FTB from attempting to collect the year 2000 taxes.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of California Franchise Tax Bd. v. Joyce (In re Joyce) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 23, 2007 , LexisNexis #0507-067