Skip to main content

§ 102(1)(B)

Roberts v. Pierce (In re Pierce)

Ruling
Order regarding proof of claim was affirmed since the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in setting the particularities of notice procedure, including not conducting an evidentiary hearing.
Procedural posture

Appellant claimant challenged an order of the district court, which affirmed a bankruptcy court's order granting in part and disallowing in part a proof of claim against appellee debtor without holding an evidentiary hearing in a voluntary chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roberts v. Pierce (In re Pierce) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on January 25, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-001