Skip to main content

§ 102

Tejeda, In re

Ruling
Trustee's objection to the creditor's claim was denied where creditor's lien against the debtor'sreal property secures a right to payment and as such creditor has a claim against property ofthe debtor. (Bankr. W.D. Tex.)
Issue(s)
Rules of Construction; Use of “Claim Against the Debtor”.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tejeda, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 03, 2018 , LexisNexis #0618-001

In re Sarahs Tent LLC

Ruling
Sale of debtor's assets free and clear approved.
Procedural posture

The court entered an order authorizing the sale of substantially all of the debtor's assets free and clear of liens, claims, and encumbrances, the assumption and assignment of the debtor's principal leasehold, and related relief.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sarahs Tent LLC Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on November 07, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-071

Harris v. Boyd G. Montgomery Testamentary Trust (In re Harris)

Ruling
Order granting a lessor's motion to terminate the automatic stay was affirmed since the debtor had been provided with reasonable notice of the motion's hearing.
Procedural posture

Appellant chapter 13 debtor challenged the Bankruptcy Court for Eastern District of Arkansas's order granting appellee lessor's motion to terminate the automatic stay so that it could enforce its state law right to remove the debtor from a nonresidential building.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harris v. Boyd G. Montgomery Testamentary Trust (In re Harris) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on February 15, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-076

Roberts v. Pierce (In re Pierce)

Ruling
Order regarding proof of claim was affirmed since the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in setting the particularities of notice procedure, including not conducting an evidentiary hearing.
Procedural posture

Appellant claimant challenged an order of the district court, which affirmed a bankruptcy court's order granting in part and disallowing in part a proof of claim against appellee debtor without holding an evidentiary hearing in a voluntary chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Roberts v. Pierce (In re Pierce) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
opinion summary, case decided on January 25, 2006 , LexisNexis #0206-001