Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge mcniff

In re Heinze

Ruling
Case ordered converted or dismissed for abuse due to understatement of disposable income.
Procedural posture

Bankruptcy debtors asserted that they had insufficient disposable income to repay creditors, but the bankruptcy trustee contended that the debtors claimed unwarranted dependents, and excessive cell phone expenses and tax liability, in calculating their disposable monthly income. The trustee moved to dismiss the debtors' case based on the presumption of abuse of chapter 7 bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(2).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Heinze Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 01, 2011 , LexisNexis #0211-061

In re Steele

Ruling
Plan could not be confirmed due to unnecessary expenses, separate treatment of student loan debt and mathematical errors.
Procedural posture

Debtors, a husband and wife, filed a petition under chapter 7 in December 2009 and converted their case to one under chapter 13 in March 2010. Debtors filed an amended plan for repaying their creditors under chapter 13, and a trustee who was appointed to administer the debtors' chapter 13 bankruptcy estate filed an objection to the plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Steele Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 18, 2010 , LexisNexis #1210-126

In re Urban

Ruling
Case dismissed due to presumption of abuse after modifications to schedules.
Procedural posture

In debtor's chapter 7 proceeding, the United States trustee made a motion to dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(1) and (2) or , in the alternative, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(1) and (3). Debtor filed an objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Urban Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 24, 2010 , LexisNexis #0810-129

In re Kreiling

Ruling
Chapter 7 case dismissed under totality of circumstances due to debtors' excessive budget.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a chapter 7 petition and the United States Trustee (UST) moved to dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b), contending that the presumption of abuse applied.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Kreiling Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-126

In re Peterson

Ruling
Involuntary petition dismissed due to numerous contested claims.
Procedural posture

Petitioning creditors brought an involuntary petitions against alleged debtors under 11 U.S.C.S. § 303.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Peterson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 05, 2010 , LexisNexis #0410-039

In re Mowrey

Ruling
Reaffirmation agreement not approved due to debtor's failure to rebut presumption of undue hardship.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, and he asked the court to approve three reaffirmation agreements he negotiated with a credit union, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524. The court held a hearing on the debtor's motions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mowrey Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 21, 2010 , LexisNexis #0310-047

In re Relka

Ruling
Relief from stay granted to mortgage creditor.
Procedural posture

This matter came before the court for an evidentiary hearing on a creditor's motion for an order granting relief from the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(d) and debtor's objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Relka Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 18, 2009 , LexisNexis #0210-045

In re Monson

Ruling
Plan calling for payment of mortgage over course of 57 months confirmed over mortgagee's objection.
Procedural posture

This matter came before the court for an evidentiary hearing on the confirmation of the debtor's amended chapter 13 plan and an objection filed by a mortgagee on the debtor's residence.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Monson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2009 , LexisNexis #0110-098

Ferrin v. College of St. Catherine (In re Ferrin)

Ruling
Combative and socially averse debtor who had held 40 jobs at an income level of ten dollars hourly granted undue hardship discharge of student loan debt.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor filed an adversary complaint to determine that his student loan debts to defendant creditors was dischargeable in bankruptcy, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ferrin v. College of St. Catherine (In re Ferrin) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on April 30, 2007 , LexisNexis #0607-061

Hurless v. Jenkins (In re Jenkins)

Ruling
Marital debts were dischargeable where debtor had no disposable income.
Procedural posture

Debtor's former spouse filed an adversary proceeding against the debtor seeking a determination that certain marital debts owed to her were nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(15).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hurless v. Jenkins (In re Jenkins) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on November 06, 2006 , LexisNexis #1206-076