Skip to main content

Pitts, In re--Pitts v. Lakota

Pitts, In re--Pitts v. Lakota

Ruling
State court small claims judgments under Cal. Civ. Code § 1719 did not establish debtors'fraud as the statute did not require fraud or fraudulent intent to impose liability for passinga check on insufficient funds. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False Representations or Actual Fraud.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pitts, In re--Pitts v. Lakota Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 21, 2018 , LexisNexis #1018-012