Pitts, In re--Pitts v. Lakota

Ruling: 
State court small claims judgments under Cal. Civ. Code § 1719 did not establish debtors'fraud as the statute did not require fraud or fraudulent intent to impose liability for passinga check on insufficient funds. (Bankr. E.D. Cal.)
Issue: 
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Fraud; False Pretenses, False Representations or Actual Fraud.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Pitts, In re--Pitts v. Lakota. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on August 21,2018, LexisNexis #1018-012