Skip to main content

Christenson v. Lee (In re Lee)

Christenson v. Lee (In re Lee)

Ruling
Claim of gun buyer was nondischargeable due to debtor seller's misrepresentations.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff gun buyer filed this adversary proceeding claiming that defendant debtor's debt to the gun buyer arose from fraud and therefore was non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A). He also contended that the debtor withheld information on his schedules and that the entire discharge should be denied.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Christenson v. Lee (In re Lee) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 02, 2009 , LexisNexis #1009-081